NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T



SPONSOR: Vaughn DATE TYPED: 05/07/99 HB 18
SHORT TITLE: Increase District Attorney Salaries SB
ANALYST: Pickering

APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000 FY99 FY2000
NFI $ 74.5 $ 0.0 NFI Recurring GF

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Relates to HB6



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Administrative Office of the District Attorneys (AODA)

LFC Files



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



HB18 declares an emergency for the public peace, health and safety to increase the salaries of district attorneys immediately. The bill appropriates $74,478 from the general fund to AODA for expenditure in FY2000 for the purpose of paying salaries and benefits for the district attorneys. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY2000 shall revert to the general fund.



Significant Issues



According to AODA, HB18 basically provides for a 6.0 percent salary increase for district attorneys, who have not received pay increases since FY96. It also authorizes that for FY2001 and all subsequent fiscal years, the annual salary for the district attorneys shall be established by the legislature in an appropriation act. This provision gives the legislature the authority to raise salaries in the future without having to amend the statute which sets district attorney salaries each time there is an increase. However, the bill does not address the possible costs for FY2001 and outlying years when the district attorney salaries would be established by the legislature in the appropriation act.



For FY2000, the bill provides salaries of $74,481 for district attorneys with non-class A counties. The bill also provides salaries of $78,401 for district attorneys serving districts with class A counties (i.e., counties with populations of one hundred thousand persons or more).



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



For FY2000, the general fund would increase by a total of $74,478, which includes both salaries and benefits for the district attorneys. This appropriation would go through AODA to be transferred to each district attorney's office.



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



HB18 relates to HB6, which provides a 4.9 percent salary increase for the district attorneys. Also, HB6 does not make an appropriation for FY2000.



CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL



The district attorneys will begin another fiscal year without any type of salary increase since FY96.



RWP/gm