NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: SPAC DATE TYPED: 3/9/99 HB
SHORT TITLE: Amend Gaming Control Act SB 790/SPACS
ANALYST: Hadwiger


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000 FY99 FY2000
Indeter.

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



The bill would amend the Gaming Control Act 1) to require that the Gaming Control Board (GCB) conduct annual audits of financial reports submitted by licensees by comparison with data submitted to the board through the central system to ensure accuracy of the data reported by licensees, 2) to prohibit the GCB from requiring that a licensee have an annual audit conducted by an independent auditor or certified public accountant if it provides accurate accounts that conform to audits of the financial records of the licensee conducted by the GCB, 3) prohibits the GCB from requiring that a licensee have an independent audit conducted by an auditor or certified public accountant as a requirement for renewal of his license, and 4) requiring nonprofit gaming operator licensees to distribute at least 60 percent (rather than 88 percent under current statute) of the net take after payment of the gaming tax and any income taxes, for charitable or educational purposes.



Significant Issues



This bill appears to be designed to address concerns raised by veterans and fraternal organizations that annual audit requirements under current statute are onerous and that it is difficult to pay for the costs of operating gaming machines and to disperse 88 percent of net take after payment of taxes to charitable or educational purposes.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The bill would place additional administrative burdens on the Gaming Control Board which might require additional staff and funding.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



As drafted, the bill would require the GCB to audit all licensees through data in the central system. Only gaming operator licensees are connected to the central system. Licensees for manufacturers and distributors are not connected to the central monitoring system, so it would not be possible for the GCB to audit these licensees through this procedure.



If adopted, this bill might conflict with Section 60-2E-19 NMSA 1978 which would continue to require that company applicants provide to the GCB: "balance sheets and profit and loss statements for at least the three preceding fiscal years, or, if the company has not been in business for a period of three years, balance sheets and profit and loss statements from the time of its commencement of business operations and projected for three years from the time of its commencement of business operations. All balance sheets and profit and loss statements shall be certified by independent certified public accountants." It is not clear if this bill intends to eliminate requirements for independent financial audits for all licensees or if it is intended to apply more narrowly to gaming operator licensees.



DH/gm