NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Duran DATE TYPED: 03/01/99 HB
SHORT TITLE: Midterm Salary Increases for County Officers SB 745
ANALYST: Gonzales


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000 FY99 FY2000
$ 0.0



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates HB765 Companion to HJR17 Relates to HB764, SB744



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Attorney General

Local Government Division, Department of Finance and Administration



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



Senate Bill 745 amends Section 4-44-12.3 NMSA 1978 that references when salary increases for elected county officials, approved by the majority of a board of county commissioners, may take place. With this bill, the salary increases may take place at any time, allowing for midterm salary increases for elected county officials.



Significant Issues



This bill is contingent upon an amendment to Article 10, Section 1 of the Constitution of New Mexico (See HJR17, 1999 Legislative Session) that allows for midterm salary increases for county officers. The Constitutional amendment would need voter approval.



According to the Attorney General, "the proposed amendment appears to be a reaction to the recent decision of the New Mexico Supreme Court in State ex rel. Haragan V. Harris, 1998-NMSC-043 [Vol. 37, No. 52, SBB 15 which looked at whether elected county officials were excepted by Article 10, Section 1 from the prohibition against midterm salary changes for public officers contained in Article 4, Section 27 of the Constitution of New Mexico.]. The court held that the general language in Article 10, Section 1 granting the legislature authority to fix county officer salaries was not sufficient to except those salaries from the prohibition. If the constitutional amendment proposed by HJR17 is not put before or approved by the state's voters, Section 4-44-12.3, as it is currently drafted will remain in effect. As currently drafted, Section 4-44-12.3 affirmatively authorizes midterm salary increases for county officers, and is unconstitutional under Haragan."



CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP



This bill duplicates HB765.



This bill relates to HB764 and SB744 which both amend the statutory provisions governing salaries of elected county officials to repeal the authority for midterm salary increases.



This bill is a companion to HJR17 which amends Article 10, Section 1 of the Constitution of New Mexico to allow for midterm salary increases for elected county officers.



TECHNICAL ISSUES



It appears that Article 4, Section 27 of the Constitution of New Mexico would also need to be amended to allow for the midterm salary increases.



POSSIBLE QUESTIONS



The Attorney General notes an alternative of amending Section 4-44-12.3 so that it authorizes salary increases for elected county officers only at the beginning of their terms of office, and make the amendment effective only if HJR17 is not adopted.



JMG/njw