NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Internet/Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.
SPONSOR: | Lyons | DATE TYPED: | 2/23/99 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Eagle Nest Lake Negotiation & Purchase | SB | 639 | ||||
ANALYST: | Esquibel |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY99 | FY2000 | FY99 | FY2000 | ||
$ 2,000.0 | Non-Recurring | Game Prot Fd | |||
$ 9,000.0 | Non-Recurring | Bonds, Public
Proj Revolv-
ing Fund | |||
$ 365.0 | Recurring | GF | |||
$ 2,250.0 | Non-Recurring | GF |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB638; Conflicts with SB52, SB80 and HB26
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
New Mexico Finance Authority (NMFA)
Department of Game and Fish (DGF)
Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD)
State Land Office (SLO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 639 proposes the State Game Commission negotiate the purchase of Eagle Nest Lake, the associated dam and surrounding land. If purchased, the General Services Department would own and maintain the lake, dam and land. Management of the facility would be a joint effort between the Department of Game and Fish; State Parks Division of the Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department; and the Interstate Stream Commission.
Significant Issues
The last appraisal of the Eagle Nest Lake property was conducted 1995 and appraised the property at $11 million. The current value is unknown, although the current private owners of the property have suggested a selling price of $22 million.
The facility is leased by the state, with the lease expiring in 1999 and appearing ineligible for renewal. The operation of the lake provides a significant economic boost to the surrounding locale.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
SB639 proposes that a portion of the revenue to purchase the Eagle Nest property may come in the form of a land swap, or that one or both of the following appropriations may be used in FY2000:
The NMFA indicates granting up to $9 million in bond proceeds generated from bonding against the public project revolving fund would greatly impact the funds ability to finance its current revolving loan projects which total $163.5 million; as well as proposed revolving loan projects contained in SB46 which total $117.9 million. The accumulation of the two sets of revolving loan projects approaches the maximum capacity of the fund, thus not providing for much remaining capacity to grant bond proceeds for the acquisition of the Eagle Nest Lake property.
The DGF indicates that use of $2 million in game protection funds would necessitate an increase in hunting and fishing license fees within 1-2 years.
The DGF indicates that ownership of the facility by the Property Control Division of the General Services Department would prohibit the use of federal funds by the DGF for the purchase of the facility.
The EMNRD indicates if the property is acquired and operated as a state park, it would require recurring operating costs approximating $365.0 in general fund.
The EMNRD and the Interstate Stream Commission indicate the facility and dam structure would require additional non-recurring capital expenditures approximating $2.25 million.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The EMNRD indicates operation of the property as a state park would require 7 new FTE.
CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP
SB639 relates to SB638 which proposes for the negotiation for acquisition of Eagle Nest dam and reservoir.
SB639 conflicts with SB52 and HB26 which require legislative approval for joint management of state properties and parks.
SB639 also conflicts with SB80 which proposes grant restrictions on the New Mexico Finance Authority.
RAE/gm