NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.
SPONSOR: | Leavell | DATE TYPED: | 02-15-99 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Gas Tax Deduction for Tribal Distributors | SB | 432 | ||||
ANALYST: | Taylor |
Subsequent
Years Impact |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||
FY99 | FY2000 | |||
N.A. | $ 1,258.0 | Uncertain | Recurring | State Road Fund |
N.A. | $ 361.0 | Uncertain | Recurring | Local Govt. Funds |
N.A. | $ 30.0 | Uncertain | Recurring | Other Funds* |
* Other funds include State Aviation Fund, Municipal Arterial fund and the Motorboat Fuel Tax Fund.
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates HB-498
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 498 amends the gasoline tax act in the following ways:
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD estimates that enacting this legislation would increase state road fund revenues by $1.3 million in FY2000 by eliminating "tax pre-empted off-reservation wholesaling activity." TRD estimates that 35 million gallons of tax preempted gasoline is sold by tribal and Indian-owned entities. Since the gasoline tax is 17 cents per gallon, the estimated revenue loss is $5.9 million. Given that the revenue gain from the proposed bill is $1.3 million, most of the revenue loss must come from retail sales.
The impact would be recurring, but the long-run impacts uncertain they say. The uncertainty is due to two offsetting factors. The proposed law would curtail the growth of wholesaling on Indian lands. On the other hand, the provision of a deduction for retailing on Indian lands could increase Indian retail gasoline sales.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD reports that the bill would have no significant administrative impact on its duties.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
TRD suggests that definition of registered Indian tribal distributors may lead to legal conflicts as "non-Indian operated business organized to appear 51% Indian owned presumably would claim the deduction for on-reservation retail sales and be denied by the department."
BT/gm