NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.
SPONSOR: | SCORC | DATE TYPED: | 03/11/98 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | 1999 Public Accountancy Act | SB | 423/SCORCS | ||||
ANALYST: | Valenzuela |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY99 | FY2000 | FY99 | FY2000 | ||
NFI | NFI |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
State Board of Public Accountancy, Regulation and Licensing Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SCORC Substitute
The Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee substitute makes two primary changes to the original bill. The bill creates a dual track process for meeting the requirements for taking the CPA exam, where it keeps the current process and adds the proposal in the original bill. Also, the bill revises the fee types, and makes numerous technical changes throughout.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 423 would rewrite the existing statute regulating public accountancy. The bill would also repeal the existing statute, which creates the state board of public accountancy.
Significant Issues
Senate Bill 423 seeks to align New Mexico's accountancy law with nationally recognized requirements for certified public accountants. Because the bill adopts nationally recognized standards, candidates for the certified public accountant (CPA) examination would be required to complete one additional college level course before taking the exam. The purpose of the bill also is to streamline many of the administrative functions currently in place. It also eliminates some of the criminal penalties of the existing statute. The bill would give the board the option to develop a scholarship program.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 423 does not contain an appropriation. The fiscal impact would be minor.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The bill is quite complex. It would repeal the existing statute, therefore, the procedures of the board would change significantly.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
MV/gm