NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.
SPONSOR: | Howes | DATE TYPED: | 03/01/99 | HB | |||
SHORT TITLE: | Change Percentage of Local Revenue Credit | SB | 418 | ||||
ANALYST: | Fernandez |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||||
FY99 | FY2000 | FY99 | FY2000 | ||
$ 13,195.6 | Recurring | GF |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB446, HB124, and HB558
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
State Department of Public Education (SDE)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 418 amends the public school funding formula to reduce the percent of local and federal receipts (impact aid, federal forest reserve, and local .5 mill levy) which the state takes into consideration in calculating the state equalization guarantee from 95 percent to 75 percent and requires school districts to budget the 20 percent difference for capital outlay purposes. The bill also eliminates a section of the formula which is no longer necessary.
Significant Issues
According to SDE, because of its state funding formula, qualifies under federal requirements as an equalized state and is allowed to consider eligible federal and local revenue in determining the amount of state aid to public school districts. This proposal will not affect the state's ability to qualify as an equalized state to take credit for impact aid funds as the state will still be able to meet the stringent disparity and proportionate tests set forth in federal law.
Impact Aid - Impact Aid was initially designed and authorized to relieve local education agencies for the loss of local property taxes as a result of federal presence. During reauthorization in 1994, impact aid also recognized students residing on Indian land, students residing in federal low rent housing, and children whose parents live or work on federal property for the purpose of generating impact aid funds. Reauthorization of Impact Aid is currently under consideration by Congress, which may have an effect on this proposal.
In the 1997-98 school year, thirty-eight school districts received impact aid funds and SDE expects that twenty-eight districts will receive funds in 1998-99.
Forest Reserve Funds - Forest Reserve funds are generated as a result of federal forest reserve acreage in New Mexico. The forest reserve funds are received by Department of Finance and Administration, Local Government Division, and are allocated 50 percent to qualifying counties and 50 percent to school districts using the 40th day student count. According to SDE, fifty seven school districts received forest reserve funds during the 1997-98 school year.
Local Half Mill Levy Funds - Local tax levy funds are the result of a statutorily mandated half-mill levy applicable to all 89 school districts. Taxpayers are assessed a half (.05) mill levy on their property base on their assessed valuation.
Eligible federal impact aid revenues exclude Indian add-on and Special Education set-asides.
Districts will continue to budget 5 percent of eligible local and federal revenue for general operational purposes.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The table below illustrates total credits budgeted in 1998-99, SDE projections at 95 percent in 1999-2000, SDE projections at 75 percent in 1999-2000 and amounts that would be dedicated to capital outlay under this proposal.
Budgeted
1998-99@95% |
Projections @ 95% 1999-2000 | Projections @75% 1999-2000 | Difference
Capital Outlay | |
Impact Aid | $42,179.3 | $54,150.0 | $42,750.0 | $11,400.0 |
Forest Reserve | $300.0 | $387.6 | $306.0 | $81.6 |
Local Tax Levy | $8,000.0 | $8,141.5 | $6,427.5 | $1,714.0 |
TOTAL | $50,479.3 | $62,679.1 | $49,483.5 | $13,195.6 |
It should be noted that President Clinton's 2000 budget includes a proposal to reduce impact aid funding for New Mexico by approximately $23.4 million dollars below the current level. This proposal is contrary to the department's estimate of $54,150.0 in federal impact aid revenue for 1999-2000 which projects a 28.3 percent increase in federal impact aid revenue over the current year level of $42,179.3.
The difference between the projected revenues at 95 percent for FY2000 and projected revenues at 75 percent, is $13,195.6. Both Senate Bill 3/aSEC and House Bill 3/aHEC, consider the credits at 95 percent. If this bill is enacted, an additional general fund appropriation of $13,195.6 would be necessary.
CONFLICT/DUPLICATION/COMPANIONSHIP/RELATIONSHIP
Relates to SB446, HB124, and HB558.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
SDE indicates that the title of the bill should include both local and federal revenue.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
If the President's FY2000 proposal is adopted, the loss in impact aid funding for New Mexico would be significant. The loss may result in a need for a deficiency appropriation by the 2000 Legislature or a significant reduction in funding for public schools.
CTF/gm