NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Smith DATE TYPED: 3/9/99 HB
SHORT TITLE: Repeal Bicycle Racing Act SB 340
ANALYST: Hadwiger


APPROPRIATION



Appropriation Contained
Estimated Additional Impact
Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000 FY99 FY2000
NFI



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)



Duplicates/Conflicts with/Companion to/Relates to



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



LFC Files

No comments were received from the Bicycle Racing Commission



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



The bill would delete the Bicycle Racing Act.



Significant Issues



The notion of competitive bicycle racing is appealing to many New Mexicans. The New Mexico legislature enacted the Bicycle Racing Act in 1991 in order to allow parimutuel bicycle racing on Keiren velodrome tracks. Since that time, however, the Bicycle Racing Commission (BRC) which was created to regulate bicycle racing has failed to develop a regulatory structure to allow bicycle racing in New Mexico.



The BRC was dormant during its first two years of existence due to appointment of one commissioner who was unwilling to attend commission meetings. Then the BRC received $32.2 general fund to develop regulations for Keiren velodrome bicycle racing. However, when these regulations were submitted to the Office of the Attorney General, they were found to be in violation of the Bicycle Racing Act. At the same time, the BRC was forced to operate in violation of statute requiring that it be funded only with parimutuel revenues from bicycle racing and that it maintain an office and executive director.



In order for the BRC regulations to be implemented, the Bicycle Racing Act would need to be amended to allow implementation of the BRC regulations. However, the BRC has not offered such an amendment in the 1999 legislature. Also, neither the Legislative Finance Committee nor the Governor's recommended budget for the BRC includes general fund support which would be necessary for the agency to initiate its regulatory operations.



Finally, it should be noted that, in its proposed regulations, the BRC has delegated most of the statutory responsibilities to the employees ("commissionaires") of bicycle-racing promoters. Delegated activities include a starter, a registrar, a finish judge, a photo finish camera operator, a bicycle inspector, a parimutuel manager, and a drug control officer. Under the current BRC regulations, it is possible that no BRC member or employee would attend BRC-regulated bicycle races, despite statutory requirements that commission employees select bicycle racers for saliva and urine tests at every race and which require the commission to supervise the operations of parimutuel machines and equipment and the operation of all money rooms, accounting rooms and seller's and cashier's windows and to supervise the weighing and inspection of bicycles at races.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



There would be no fiscal impact from passage of this bill.



DH/njw