NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature.  The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.



The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.



Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.





F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T





SPONSOR: Lujan DATE TYPED: 02/16/99 HB 530
SHORT TITLE: Amend Taxation and Revenue Department Act SB
ANALYST: Eaton


REVENUE



Estimated Revenue
Subsequent

Years Impact

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY99 FY2000
(unknown) Recurring General Fund
(unknown) Recurring Counties/Munic.



(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)



SOURCES OF INFORMATION



Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)



SUMMARY



Synopsis of Bill



This bill would permit the pueblos of Santa Ana and Laguna to enter into agreements with the Taxation and Revenue Department whereby they would receive credit against state and local gross receipts taxes payable to the state. The amount of credit would be equal to the lesser of seventy five percent of the Pueblo tax imposed.



This bill is designed to eliminate the double taxation that occurs when both the state and pueblo(s) impose a gross receipts tax.



The pueblo of Santa Clara currently has an agreement like this with the state.



Significant Issues



This bill would make it easier for the pueblos to attract commerce to pueblo lands. While purchase of reservation land is not permitted, this legislation would be attractive to businesses considering establishing operations on pueblo land.



FISCAL IMPLICATIONS



The impact to the general fund will be negative but to what extent is unknown at this time. The fiscal impact to the pueblos will be positive.



Because this legislation is attractive to businesses, the possible increase in pueblo commerce over time and the general fund revenues generated as a result, may outweigh the short term negative impacts this legislation would have in the absence of new commerce.



ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS



The Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD) estimates the cost of reprogramming TRD computers would be $15,000.



JBE/gm