NOTE: As provided in LFC policy, this report is intended for use by the standing finance committees of the legislature. The Legislative Finance Committee does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of the information in this report when used in any other situation.
The LFC is only preparing FIRs on bills referred to the Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Ways and Means Committee, the House Appropriations and Finance Committee and the House Taxation and Revenue Committee. The chief clerks are responsible for preparing and issuing all other bill analyses.
Only the most recent FIR version, excluding attachments, is available on the Intranet. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC office in Room 416 of the State Capitol Building.
SPONSOR: | Vigil | DATE TYPED: | 02/22/99 | HB | 368 | ||
SHORT TITLE: | Law Enforcement Training Expenses | SB | |||||
ANALYST: | Trujillo |
Subsequent
Years Impact |
Recurring
or Non-Rec |
Fund
Affected | ||
FY99 | FY2000 | |||
$ (15.4) | $ (15.4) | Recurring | OSF | |
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
HB 368 amends the NMSA 1978, Sections 29-7-12, in order to no longer allow the Department of Public Safety (DPS) Training & Recruiting Division to charge any of the costs of basic law
enforcement training to post secondary educational institutions.
Significant Issues
According to DPS, current law allows DPS Training to waive the charges for "local public bodies" (i.e.; municipal and county law enforcement agencies) and tribal police agencies to attend the basic law enforcement academy. The DPS Training & Recruiting Division currently charges state law enforcement agencies the costs of food and lodging for their employees.
Also, by legislative mandate, the DPS Training & Recruiting Division must generate revenue to support its training programs. Almost half of the revenue generated is from charges to state agencies for the costs of basic training. Passage of this bill in the present form would have an adverse effect on the ability of the Division to generate the required revenue.
DPS reports, passage of this bill would create an inequity among state-funded law enforcement agencies.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
According to DPS, based upon the number of university police officers that have attended the basic law enforcement academy over the past few years, we can reasonably expect to lose $15,360.00 a year in decreased revenue.
Unless the revenue requirement was commensurately reduced, and the general fund budget increased by a like amount, this HB 368 would effectively reduce the DPS budget.
DPS reports, there would presumably be a recurring revenue reduction to DPS as the agencies involved will have staff turnover, and others will be required to attend the Academy.
Based upon actual attendance for the past two fiscal years, approximately 6 university police officers attend the basic law enforcement academy every year. Room and board for the officers is $40.00 a day, amounting to $2,560.00 each under the current fee schedule approved by the Law Enforcement Academy Board.
DPS reports, it is not known whether passage of the proposed legislation will affect any local or federal matching funds or appropriations. However, presumably the university police departments include this expense in their yearly budget request to the Governor and the Legislature. If this will no longer be a cost item, their budgets should be able to be reduced by the like amount.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to DPS, the Legislature sets a yearly revenue amount we must generate. This money is approximately 1\5 of the appropriated yearly Division budget.
DPS reports, if the bill passed in its present form, Division revenues would be reduced. If the
Division cannot meet the yearly revenue projections, the shortfall must be made up by canceling
advanced training classes.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The Attorney General reports, the bill, as written, provides that all costs associated with basic law enforcement training in post-secondary institutions will be borne by the New Mexico law enforcement Academy. The bill does not specify that the schools must be state or state-supported institutions.
LAT/prr