HOUSE BILL 158
51st legislature - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - first session, 2013
INTRODUCED BY
Patricia A. Lundstrom
FOR THE LEGISLATIVE FINANCE COMMITTEE
AN ACT
RELATING TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS; AMENDING THE PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE ACT TO REQUIRE PERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETS FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND CHARTER SCHOOLS, TO ESTABLISH AND IMPLEMENT AN EFFECTIVE TEACHER INDEX, TO CLARIFY CLASSIFICATION OF SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS AND ANCILLARY STAFF AND TO MODIFY AND UPDATE THE AT-RISK FACTOR IN THE FUNDING FORMULA; RECONCILING MULTIPLE AMENDMENTS TO THE SAME SECTION OF LAW IN LAWS 1999; MAKING AN APPROPRIATION.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
SECTION 1. Section 22-8-6 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1967, Chapter 16, Section 60, as amended by Laws 1999, Chapter 281, Section 21 and by Laws 1999, Chapter 291, Section 2) is amended to read:
"22-8-6. BUDGETS--SUBMISSION--FAILURE TO SUBMIT.--
A. Prior to April 15 of each year, each local school board shall submit to the department an operating budget for the school district and any charter [schools] school in the school district for the ensuing fiscal year. Upon written approval of the [state superintendent] secretary, the date for the submission of the operating budget as required by this section may be extended to a later date fixed by the [state superintendent] secretary.
B. The operating budget required by this section may include:
(1) estimates of the cost of insurance policies for periods up to five years if a lower rate may be obtained by purchasing insurance for the longer term; or
(2) estimates of the cost of contracts for the transportation of students for terms extending up to four years.
C. The operating budget required by this section shall include a budget for each charter school of the membership projected for each charter school, the total program units generated at that charter school and approximate anticipated disbursements and expenditures at each charter school.
D. If a local school board fails to submit a budget pursuant to this section, the department shall prepare the operating budget for the school district for the ensuing fiscal year. A local school board shall be considered as failing to submit a budget pursuant to this section if the budget submitted exceeds the total projected resources of the school district or if the budget submitted does not comply with the law or with rules and procedures of the department.
E. Beginning with the 2014-2015 school year, all school districts shall submit performance-based budgets that comply with the requirements of the Accountability in Government Act and shall be in a form specified by the department."
SECTION 2. Section 22-8-6.1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1993, Chapter 227, Section 8, as amended) is amended to read:
"22-8-6.1. CHARTER SCHOOL BUDGETS.--
A. Each state-chartered charter school shall submit to the charter schools division of the department a school-based budget. For the first year of operation, the budget of every state-chartered charter school shall be based on the projected number of program units generated by that charter school and its students, using the at-risk index and the instructional staff training and experience index for the 2013-2014 school year and, thereafter, by the effective teacher index of the school district in which it is geographically located. For second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, the budgets of state-chartered charter schools shall be based on the number of program units generated using the average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year and its own [instructional staff training and experience] effective teacher index and the at-risk index of the school district in which the state-chartered charter school is geographically located. The budget shall be submitted to the division for approval or amendment pursuant to the Public School Finance Act and the Charter Schools Act.
B. Beginning with the 2014-2015 school year, all state-chartered charter schools shall submit performance-based budgets that comply with the requirements of the Accountability in Government Act and shall be in a form specified by the department.
[B.] C. Each locally chartered charter school shall submit to the local school board a school-based budget. For the first year of operation, the budget of every locally chartered charter school shall be based on the projected number of program units generated by the charter school and its students, using the at-risk index and the instructional staff training and experience index for the 2013-2014 school year and, thereafter, by the effective teacher index of the school district in which it is geographically located. For second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, the budgets of locally chartered charter schools shall be based on the number of program units generated using the average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year and its own [instructional staff training and experience] effective teacher index and the at-risk index of the school district in which the locally chartered charter school is geographically located. The budget shall be submitted to the local school board for approval or amendment. The approval or amendment authority of the local school board relative to the charter school budget is limited to ensuring that sound fiscal practices are followed in the development of the budget and that the charter school budget is within the allotted resources. The local school board shall have no veto authority over individual line items within the charter school's proposed budget, but shall approve or disapprove the budget in its entirety. Upon final approval of the local budget by the local school board, the individual charter school budget shall be included separately in the budget submission to the department required pursuant to the Public School Finance Act and the Charter Schools Act.
D. Beginning with the 2014-2015 school year, all locally chartered charter schools shall submit performance-based budgets that comply with the requirements of the Accountability in Government Act and shall be in a form specified by the department.
[C.] E. For the first year of operation after a locally chartered charter school converts to a state-chartered charter school or a state-chartered charter school converts to a locally chartered charter school, the charter school's budget shall be based on the number of program units generated using the average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year and the instructional staff training and experience index for the 2013-2014 school year and, thereafter, by the effective teacher index and the at-risk index of the school district in which it is geographically located. For second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, the charter school shall follow the provisions of Subsection A or [B] C of this section, as applicable.
[D. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsections A through C of this section, each charter school that was in existence in fiscal year 2009 shall be held harmless in the calculation of its instructional staff training and experience index for two fiscal years. For fiscal years 2010 and 2011, the department shall use the greater of the charter school's 2008-2009 funded instructional staff training and experience index or the charter school's own instructional staff training and experience index. Beginning in fiscal year 2012, each charter school shall use its own instructional staff training and experience index.]"
SECTION 3. Section 22-8-7 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1967, Chapter 16, Section 61, as amended) is amended to read:
"22-8-7. BUDGETS--FORM.--Beginning with the 2014-2015 school year, budgets submitted to the department by a school district or state-chartered charter school, or budgets submitted by a locally chartered charter school to its chartering school district, shall be performance-based budgets that comply with requirements of the Accountability in Government Act and shall be in a form specified by the department."
SECTION 4. Section 22-8-18 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1974, Chapter 8, Section 8, as amended) is amended to read:
"22-8-18. PROGRAM COST CALCULATION--LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY.--
A. The total program units for the purpose of computing the program cost shall be calculated by multiplying the sum of the program units itemized as Paragraphs (1) [through (6)] and (2) in this subsection by the instructional staff training and experience index for the 2013-2014 school year and, thereafter, by the effective teacher index and adding the program units itemized as Paragraphs [(7)] (3) through (13) in this subsection. The itemized program units are as follows:
(1) early childhood education;
(2) basic education;
(3) special education, adjusted by subtracting the units derived from membership in class D special education programs in private, nonsectarian, nonprofit training centers;
(4) bilingual multicultural education;
(5) fine arts education;
(6) elementary physical education;
(7) size adjustment;
(8) at-risk program;
(9) enrollment growth or new district adjustment;
(10) special education units derived from membership in class D special education programs in private, nonsectarian, nonprofit training centers;
(11) national board for professional teaching standards certification;
(12) home school student activities; and
(13) charter school student activities.
B. The total program cost calculated as prescribed in Subsection A of this section includes the cost of early childhood, special, bilingual multicultural, fine arts and vocational education and other remedial or enrichment programs. It is the responsibility of the local school board or governing body of a charter school to determine its priorities in terms of the needs of the community served by that board. Except as otherwise provided in this section, funds generated under the Public School Finance Act are discretionary to local school boards and governing bodies of charter schools; provided that the special program needs as enumerated in this section are met; and provided [however] further that if a public school has been rated D or F for two consecutive years, the department shall ensure that the local school board or governing body of a charter school is prioritizing resources for the public school toward proven programs and methods linked to improved student achievement until the public school earns a C or better for two consecutive years."
SECTION 5. Section 22-8-21 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1974, Chapter 8, Section 11, as amended) is amended to read:
"22-8-21. SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAM UNITS.--
A. For the purpose of the Public School Finance Act, special education programs for exceptional children are those approved by the department and classified as follows:
(1) class A programs, in which department- certified individuals provide services to children whose individualized education programs require a minimal amount of special education and in which the ratio of students to professionals is regulated by the [state board] department;
(2) class B programs, in which department- certified individuals provide services to children whose individualized education programs require a moderate amount of special education and in which the ratio of students to professionals is regulated by the [state board] department;
(3) class C programs, in which department- certified individuals provide services to children whose individualized education programs require an extensive amount of special education and in which the ratio of students to professionals is regulated by the [state board] department;
(4) class D programs, in which department- certified individuals provide services to children whose
individualized education programs require a maximum amount of special education and in which the ratio of students to professionals is regulated by the [state board] department. Students in class D programs may be enrolled in private, nonsectarian, nonprofit educational training centers in accordance with the provisions of Section 22-13-8 NMSA 1978; [and]
(5) programs for developmentally disabled three- and four-year-old children meeting standards approved by the [state board] department; and
(6) programs for developmentally delayed three- and four-year-old children meeting standards approved by the department.
B. By October 31, 2013, the department shall adopt rules to define minimal, moderate, extensive and maximum eligibility requirements for students classified as exceptional children in Paragraphs (1) through (6) of Subsection A of this section and to generate the program units calculated in Subsection D of this section.
[B.] C. All students assigned to the programs for exceptional children classified in Subsection A of this section shall have been so assigned as a result of diagnosis and evaluation performed in accordance with the standards of the department before the students may be counted in the determination of special education program units as provided in Subsection [C] D of this section.
[C.] D. The number of special education program units is the sum of the following:
(1) the MEM in approved class A, [and] B and developmentally delayed programs as defined in Subsection A of this section multiplied by the cost differential factor .7;
(2) the MEM in approved class C programs as defined in Subsection A of this section multiplied by the cost differential factor 1.0;
(3) the MEM in approved class D programs as defined in Subsection A of this section multiplied by the cost differential factor 2.0;
(4) the MEM for developmentally disabled three- and four-year-old children as defined in Subsection A of this section multiplied by the cost differential factor 2.0; provided that no developmentally disabled three- or four-year- old student shall be counted for additional ancillary service units; and
(5) for related services ancillary to providing special education, the number of full-time-equivalent certified or licensed ancillary service and diagnostic service personnel serving students classified as exceptional in Subsection A of this section multiplied by the cost differential factor 25.0.
[D.] E. For the purpose of calculating membership in class C and class D programs, students shall be counted in actual grade placement or according to chronological age if not in actual grade placement.
F. For purposes of calculating related services units in Paragraph (5) of Subsection D of this section, the department shall establish by rule the minimum ratios of full-time-equivalent licensed ancillary service personnel to special education full-time-equivalent students that shall be used to calculate related services units beginning with the 2014-2015 school year."
SECTION 6. Section 22-8-23.3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1997, Chapter 40, Section 7, as amended) is amended to read:
"22-8-23.3. AT-RISK PROGRAM UNITS.--
A. A school district is eligible for additional program units if it establishes within its [state board] department-approved educational plan identified services to assist students to reach their full academic potential. A school district receiving additional at-risk program units shall include a report of specified services [in its annual accountability report pursuant to Section 22-1-6 NMSA 1978], including reading coaches, additional instructional time, tutoring and school- and student-level interventions to improve academic proficiency, and intended outcomes as a supplement to its performance-based budget in a form specified by the department. The number of additional units to which a school district is entitled under this section is computed in the following manner:
[At-Risk Index x MEM = Units
where MEM is equal to the total district membership, including early childhood education, full-time-equivalent membership and special education membership and where the at-risk index is calculated in the following manner:
Three-Year Average Total Rate x 0.0915 = At-Risk Index.
B. To calculate the three-year average total rate, the department shall compute a three-year average of the school district's percentage of membership used to determine its Title I allocation, a three-year average of the percentage of membership classified as English language learners using criteria established by the federal office of civil rights and a three-year average of the percentage of student mobility. The department shall then add the three-year average rates. The number obtained from this calculation is the three-year average total rate.
C. The department shall recalculate the at-risk index for each school district every year. For the 2002-2003, 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 school years, a school district shall not receive less than ninety percent of the at-risk funding generated in fiscal year 2001.]
(1) the MEM enrolled in the federal school lunch program as defined in Subsection B of this section multiplied by a cost differential factor of 0.15 for the 2013-2014 school year, 0.30 for the 2014-2015 school year and 0.40 for the 2015-2016 school year and thereafter; plus
(2) the MEM identified as English language learners using criteria established by the federal office for civil rights by the cost differential factor 0.1 beginning in the 2013-2014 school year.
B. For the purpose of calculating MEM in Paragraph (1) of Subsection A of this section, a student must be enrolled in either free or reduced-priced meals in the federal school lunch program. For the 2013-2014 school year, state-chartered or locally chartered charter schools may use the Title I percentage of the district in which the charter school is geographically located for calculating the MEM in Paragraph (1) of Subsection A of this section. Beginning with the 2014-2015 school year, each charter school shall demonstrate that a student qualifying under this section meets eligibility requirements in Paragraphs (1) and (2) of Subsection A of this section.
C. The department shall audit the MEM counts in this section not less than every three years and more often if required by the secretary."
SECTION 7. Section 22-8-24 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1974, Chapter 8, Section 15, as amended by Laws 1993, Chapter 91, Section 1 and by Laws 1993, Chapter 237, Section 3) is repealed and a new Section 22-8-24 NMSA 1978 is enacted to read:
"22-8-24. [NEW MATERIAL] EFFECTIVE TEACHER INDEX--DEFINITIONS--FACTORS--CALCULATIONS.--
A. For the purposes of calculating the effective teacher index, the following definitions and limitations shall apply:
(1) "teaching staff" means a licensed teacher who is assigned classroom teaching responsibilities;
(2) the number of teaching staff to be counted in calculating the effective teacher index is the actual number of full-time-equivalent teaching staff on the October payroll beginning with October 2013 and each October thereafter;
(3) the number of years of experience to be used in calculating the effective teacher index is that number of years of experience as determined by department rule; and
(4) the teaching license level as described in the School Personnel Act.
B. The factors for each classification of license level by years of experience are provided in the following table:
License Level
Years of Experience 1 2 3
0-12 0.75 1.00 1.18
13 and above 1.08 1.25.
C. The effective teacher index for each school district or charter school shall be calculated in accordance with instructions issued by the department. The following calculations shall be computed:
(1) multiply the number of full-time-equivalent teaching staff in each license level by the numerical factor in the appropriate years of experience row in Subsection B of this section;
(2) add the products calculated in Paragraph (1) of this subsection; and
(3) divide the total obtained in Paragraph (2) of this subsection by the total number of full-time-equivalent teaching staff.
D. In the event that the result of the calculation of the effective teacher index is 1.0 or less, the school district's or charter school's factor shall be no less than 1.0.
E. In the event that a new school district or charter school is created, the effective teacher index for that school district or charter school is 1.0."
SECTION 8. TEMPORARY PROVISION--SCHOOL DISTRICT PROTECTION FROM PROGRAM UNIT CALCULATION REDUCTIONS.--
A. Using funds appropriated by the legislature, the public education department shall implement a program to maintain school districts' and charter schools' respective program unit calculations in cases of reductions that result only from implementation of the provisions of this act and:
(1) for the 2013-2014 school year, the department shall maintain school districts' and charter schools' respective program unit calculations at one hundred percent of the 2012-2013 school year's program unit calculations only from implementation of the provisions of this act;
(2) for the 2014-2015 school year, the department shall maintain school districts' and charter schools' respective program unit calculations at a minimum of seventy-five percent of the 2013-2014 school year's program unit calculations only from implementation of the provisions of this act; and
(3) for the 2015-2016 school year, the department shall maintain school districts' and charter schools' respective program unit calculations at a minimum of fifty percent of the 2014-2015 school year's program unit calculations only from implementation of the provisions of this act.
B. The public education department shall provide the legislative education study committee and the legislative finance committee with a report on school districts' and charter schools' respective program unit calculations implemented only as a result of the provisions of this act before the 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 legislative sessions.
SECTION 9. APPROPRIATION.--Five million seven hundred thousand dollars ($5,700,000) is appropriated from the separate account of the appropriation contingency fund that represented a distribution from the permanent school fund pursuant to Paragraph (1) of Subsection G of Section 7 of Article 12 of the constitution of New Mexico that was created in Laws 2004, Chapter 114, Section 12 to the public education department for expenditure in fiscal year 2014 to carry out the purposes of Section 8 of this act.
SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the provisions of Section 7 of this act is July 1, 2014.
- 18 -