Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR Jennings

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

8/16/08

8/19/08 HB

SHORT TITLE Flood Damage in Lincoln and Otero Counties

SB

29/aSCW/aHTRC/

HFA#1

ANALYST Weber

APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)

Appropriation

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

FY09

FY10

$5,000.0

Non-recurring

General Fund

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Relates to HB16 and SB 2

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

SUMMARY

Synopsis of HFA#1

The House Floor Amendment makes the following changes to Senate Bill 29 as amended by the

House Taxation and Revenue Committee.

Strike House Taxation and Revenue Committee items 1 and 5. This deletes the $1 million

appropriation to Valencia County for infrastructure damage.

Synopsis of HTRC Amendment

The House Tax and Revenue Committee makes the following changes to Senate Bill 29 as

amended by the Senate Committee as a Whole:

1.

On page 1 line 12 add Valencia County

2.

On page 1, line 19 the appropriation is directed to the Department of Homeland Security

and Emergency Management rather than the Department of Transportation.

3.

On page 1, line 21 after “roads” strike “and” and insert in lieu thereof a comma.

4.

On page 1 line 21 add infrastructure to approved uses of the funds.

5.

On page 2 insert “one million ($1,000,000) is appropriated from the general fund to the

local government division of the department of finance and administration for

expenditure in fiscal years 2009 and 2010 for relief of severe flood and other storm

Senate Bill 29/aSCW/aHTRC/HFA#1 – Page

2

damage in the city of Belen in Valencia County. Any unexpended or unencumbered

balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2010 shall revert to the general fund.

Synopsis of SCW Amendment

The Senate Committee as a Whole Amendment to Senate Bill 29. On page1, line 17 the

appropriation to the Department of Transportation is changed to $4.9 million from $5 million.

Synopsis of Original Bill

Senate Bill 29 appropriates monies for two purposes.

1.

Five million dollars is appropriated to the Department of Transportation to plan, design

and construct improvements to roads and bridges damaged by flooding in Lincoln and

Otero Counties.

2.

One hundred thousand is appropriated to the Department of Homeland Security and

Emergency Management for emergency relief for flood victims along the Rio Ruidoso as

provided in Section 12-11-25.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

The appropriation of $5 million contained in this bill to DOT is a Non-recurring expense to the

General fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY2013 shall

revert to the General Fund.

The appropriation of $100 thousand contained in this bill to DHLSEM is a Non-recurring

expense to the General fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of

FY2010 shall revert to the General Fund.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

Severe rains July 26 and 27 spawned by the remnants of Hurricane Dolly led to damaging and

dangerous flooding in Lincoln and Otero Counties. On July 28 Governor Richardson issued

Executive Order 2008-042 declaring a disaster in Lincoln County thereby releasing $750

thousand to the Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHLSEM) to

help defray local costs associated with the disaster.

After the initial emergency and rescue operations by DHLSEM and the National Guard,

assessment teams from both the state and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

began estimating infrastructure damage and costs to rehabilitate the area. Information gathered

by the teams pointed to damage being extensive enough to meet federal thresholds to qualify for

FEMA funding. Presently DHLSEM information estimates a swift final approval of the federal

aid for this purpose. Federal aid allows for a state-federal matching arrangement of 25 percent

state to 75 percent federal. The state funds can be a combination of state and local monies.

Worksheets provided by DHLSEM estimate the total required expenditures at approximately

$5.1 million. This total includes include $2.9 million for Lincoln County and $47 thousand for

Otero County for roads and bridges. DHLSEM cautions however that this should NOT be

construed as the final total costs but is rather a rough projection to determine if federal thresholds

for FEMA aid were met. Until requests for proposals are issued and bids received the actual

costs are somewhat uncertain and difficult to estimate.

Senate Bill 29/aSCW/aHTRC/HFA#1 – Page

3

Once all the funding is in place the federal funds are handled on a reimbursement basis with

generally local authorities taking the lead for plan design and construction management. For this

reason it may be advisable to direct the appropriation to Local Government Division of the

Department of Finance and Administration. This division has direct contact and arrangements

on how to coordinate local community capital projects which this type of infrastructure repair

appears to be.

The $100 thousand appropriation to DHLSEM indicates the expenditure should be for

emergency relief for flood victims along the Rio Ruidoso as provided in Section 12-11-25

NMSA 1978. The section states “The funds shall be expended by the governor or any agent or

agency designated by him for those purposes, either as a state project or for securing matching

federal funds”. Further along "state project" is defined as “an expenditure by a state agency to

provide those resources and services necessary to avoid or minimize economic or physical harm

until a situation becomes stabilized and again under local self-support and control. State project"

may include any expenditure on a temporary, emergency basis for lodging, sheltering, health

care, food, any transportation or shipping necessary to protect lives or public property; or for any

other action necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare”. This could be construed

to mean the funds are to repay governmental entities such as the National Guard or State Police

for their services in the emergency phase.

TECHNICAL ISSUES

It may be advisable to include language that clarifies how the $5 million relates to the state

matching requirement for FEMA federal funds. It is unclear if these funds are just an

appropriation for roads and bridges in Lincoln and Otero or if some or all of the $5 million

should act as the state matching requirement. If this is not clear and the funds are not spent in

the proper chronology it could result in not having state matching funds available at the required

time with the resultant loss of the 75 percent federal portion. For example, language could

provide that the primary purpose of the $5 million is to act as match and any non-matched funds

could only be expended after the depletion of FEMA funds.

MW/mt:svb