Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR McSorley
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/4/08
HB
SHORT TITLE Measure Fiscal Impact of Criminal Penalties
SM 47
ANALYST Peery-Galon
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY08
FY09
FY10 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
$0.1
$0.1
$0.1 Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Corrections Department (NMCD)
Public Defenders Department (PDD)
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
New Mexico Sentencing Commission (NMSC)
No Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the District Attorneys
Legislative Finance Committee
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Memorial 47 requests the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) and the New Mexico
Sentencing Commission (NMSC) collaborate on establishing a method, if feasible, to measure
the fiscal impact of legislation that increases or decreases criminal penalties, creates new crimes,
imposes or removes mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment, requires specific technology
for monitoring probationers or parolees, or modifies the law in such a way that the time served in
prison or on probation or parole increases or decreases. The LFC and NMSC is to determine
what computer models, technology, research, data and personnel are necessary to enable the LFC
to generate fiscal impact reports in a timely manner on legislation that affect criminal penalties.
The LFC and NMSC are to report the results to their study to the appropriate interim legislative
committee during the 2008 interim.
pg_0002
Senate Memorial No. 47 – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
NMCD states the proposed legislation has no direct fiscal impact to the department. However,
NMCD notes the memorial would be enormously beneficial to the department, if it ultimately
leads to fiscal impact reports clearly showing the exact financial impact that any new crime bill
would have on the Corrections Department.
AOC states there will be an indirect fiscal impact upon the judiciary whose staff will be asked to
assist the LFC and NMSC in establishing a method to measure the impact of appropriate
legislation.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
NMCD states while the memorial does not require that the department be given sufficient
appropriations to cover the cost of any new crime bill passed by the Legislature, it certainly
could lead to the Legislature being better informed about just how much a new crime bill will
cost before voting on the bill. NMCD notes the Legislature could still choose to pass a new
crime bill even if the financial impact on the Corrections Department was substantial, and
without making any additional appropriations to the department.
PDD states the memorial would greatly assist the department in estimating any increase in
annual operating costs as any bill increasing terms of imprisonment is likely to correlate into an
increased number of clients proceeding to trial or appealing their convictions.
AOC notes it regularly reports during the legislative session to the LFC regarding the fiscal
impact of proposed legislation upon the courts.
NMSC states it has already conducted research on issues addressed in the memorial.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
NMCD states the memorial could eventually help the department better perform its prison and
probation/parole related services, if it leads to appropriate levels of funding for the department.
AOC states the proposed legislation will have a minimal, if any, impact on performance
measures as they relate to judicial budgeting.
NMSC states the request in the memorial will add to a series of meetings to the body of work
already being accomplished by the commission.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
In the 2007 legislative session, the Legislature passed and the governor pocket vetoed House Bill
296. House Bill 296 required the New Mexico Sentencing Commission to prepare financial
impact statements for legislative bills which: create or repeal new crimes punishable by
imprisonment, increase or decrease the period of imprisonment authorized for an existing crime,
increase or decrease mandatory minimum terms or imprisonment, and modify the law governing
the release of prisoners in such a way that the time served in prison will be increased or
decreased. The fiscal impact statements were to reflect the following: increase estimate of
pg_0003
Senate Memorial No. 47 – Page
3
annual operating costs for the New Mexico Corrections Department attributable to the bill if it
became law, increase estimates of the annual operating costs of the bill over the next six years
and report the dollar impact associated with the most expensive year, and details concerning any
increase or decrease in inmate population. House Bill 296 required that an appropriation be
made from the general fund for any law that a fiscal impact statement was prepared and would
increase prison time. NMSC was to complete fiscal impact statements by January 15
th
for
proposed legislation submitted no later than December 1
st
of the prior year. House Bill 296
would have appropriated $70 thousand to the NMSC to pay salaries and benefits to staff for the
preparation of fiscal impact statements. The bill also would have created the Criminal Justice
Special Fund in the state treasury. Money in the fund was to be subject to appropriation by the
legislature for criminal justice purposes, including operational costs of the corrections
department, courts, district attorneys and the public defender department.
RPG/mt