Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR Lopez

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

1/31/08 HB

SHORT TITLE Traffic Offense Alternative Adjudications

SM 24

ANALYST Wilson

ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)

FY08 FY09 FY10 3 Year

Total Cost

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

Total

$0.1

$0.1

Recurring General Fund

& local funds

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Relates to HM 19 & HM 22

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

Responses Received From

Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Public Defender Department (PDD)

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

Senate Memorial 24

notes that removing criminal penalties, including the possibility of

incarceration in jails, from traffic and driving penalties and instead punishing violations with

civil sanctions could make better use of the resources dedicated to criminal justice without

jeopardizing public safety and without increasing the incarcerated population.

The memorial also notes that an amendment to punish traffic offenses by fines and limitations on

a driver’s credit history and ability to access public utilities could prove to be a lesser drain on

court and incarceration systems.

Therefore, SM 24 resolves that the state commence a statewide study to examine alternative

adjudicative procedures for traffic offenses, that the interim legislative committee that studies

courts and corrections issues study current New Mexico law relating to minor traffic offenses,

report the study’s findings and make recommendations for legislation prior to the first session of

the forty-ninth legislature, and that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the governor and

the co-chairs of the New Mexico Legislative Council.

Senate Memorial 24 – Page

2

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

There will be a minimal administrative cost for statewide update, distribution and documentation

of statutory changes. Any fiscal impact on the judiciary would be proportional to the removal of

criminal penalties in exchange for civil sanctions, which would result in a decrease in the use of

court resources.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

In many jurisdictions throughout New Mexico, minor traffic warrants represent more than one-

half of all outstanding warrants.

Research data collected to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of continued criminal

warrant notices have demonstrated that criminal warrants neither represent a deterrent to the

habitual offender's disregard of the traffic codes nor provide increased public safety on the

highways.

Research data indicate that the ever-increasing number of traffic warrants is not reduced until

violators are stopped on other moving violations or other criminal charges.

Currently in Bernalillo County there are an estimated 61,070 warrants for minor traffic

violations.

These violations include failure to pay fines and failure to appear in court.

In 2007, 6,224 persons were booked into the Bernalillo county metropolitan detention center for

traffic-related warrants and minor traffic violations, placing great strain on Bernalillo County’s

sentencing and court systems and Bernalillo County’s metropolitan detention center.

DUPLICATION/ RELATIONSHIP

SM 24 duplicates HM 19, Study Traffic Offense Adjudicative Procedures except for the short

title and the reference to the legislative body

SM 24 is similar to HB 22, Traffic Offense Decriminalization Task Force

DW/bb