Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR SCORC
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/7/08
2/10/08 HB
SHORT TITLE Public Peace, Health, Safety & Welfare
SB CS/551/aSCORC
ANALYST Peery-Galon
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
FY10
$25.0
$25.0 Recurring State Road Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Homeland Security and Emergency Management Department (HSEMD)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
No Responses Received From
Department of Transportation
New Mexico State University
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SCORC Amendment
The Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee amendment to Senate Bill 551 changes
the following:
On page 5, line 18, after “possession" strikes the remainder of the line and strikes lines 19
and 20 and inserts “a copy of the restrictions imposed by the state transportation
commission pursuant to Section 66-7-415 NMSA 1978 regarding the size and weight of
vehicles operated on a highway under the jurisdiction of that commission";
On page 5, line 22, after the comma inserts “freight trailer or utility"; and
On page 5, line 24, strikes “the field" and inserts “an agricultural area that lies within
New Mexico or within New Mexico and in an adjacent state".
Synopsis of SCORC Substitute
pg_0002
Senate Bill CS/551/aSCORC – Page
2
The Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 551 provides
an exception to port of entry requirements for vehicles transporting agricultural products. An
agricultural product transport vehicle is excluded if the agricultural product transport vehicle has
cleared the port of entry at least once and has successfully passed a commercial vehicle safety
alliance level 1 inspection during the current harvest season. The proposed legislation defines
“agricultural product transport vehicle" as a motor vehicle, freight trailer or utility trailer or a
combination used exclusively for hauling agricultural products harvested in the field. The
proposed legislation also creates a special permit for an annual fee of $250 for agricultural
product transport vehicles to transport loads for multiple trips. The multiple trip special permits
may be issued for up to 5,000 pounds over the gross vehicle weight and the agricultural product
transport vehicle is not to operate on highways for which a stricter size or weight limit is
required by federal law. The agricultural product transport vehicle is not to operate on routes
identified as having deficient bridge structures.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD states the fiscal impact on the State Road Fund could be positive as result of the increased
number of $250 overweight permits, and could be negative if the exception from stopping at
ports of entry has a negative influence on weight-distance tax compliance. TRD notes the net
fiscal impact to the State Road Fund might very well be negative.
DPS states the $250 overweight permits would generate in excess of $25,000 to the State Road
Fund.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
TRD reports the modest overweight allowance and permit in the proposed legislation probably
addresses a reasonable issue that may be troublesome to the industry. TRD states presumably it
is difficult to gauge the weight of agricultural product loads when products are loaded in the
field. TRD notes it is unclear why these vehicles should be excluded from all port of entry
inspection provisions.
HSEMD states that agricultural product transport vehicles’ traveling in and out of the state into
Mexico should not receive this exception. HSEMD states although the vehicles will be required
to pass through international ports of entry, they should also be required to be inspected at New
Mexico ports of entry each time they enter the state if they have exited the country and returned.
HSEMD notes because of the possible homeland security threat of dangerous cargo being
transported from Mexico, the exception should not apply to crossing international borders.
DPS states the proposed legislation would assure public safety through the inspection of each
vehicle that will be transporting agriculture products. This will provide a positive impact for the
agriculture industry, as well as, the residents of New Mexico.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
DPS states employees of the Motor Transportation Division will need to be available to conduct
inspections at the time the vehicle enters New Mexico ports of entry. This may place a burden
on the operations of the ports of entry.
pg_0003
Senate Bill CS/551/aSCORC – Page
3
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD notes the permits would be administered by the Motor Transportation Division of the
Department of Public Safety.
DPS states there will be additional overweight permits ordered through the Santa Fe Oversize
Permit Office.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
TRD states on page 4, lines 16 and 17, the term “during the current harvest season" is probably
too vague and ill-defined to be useful in administration of these provisions, particularly since
different croups may have different harvest seasons. Some specific time period should be
specified, with reference at least to major crops or crop groups.
TRD states the $250 annual permit for overweight agricultural product transport vehicles should
probably include a specification directing the permit fee revenue to the State Road Fund. While
current law Section 66-7-413 NMSA might be considered sufficient direction of the revenue, it is
not clear since other sections include specific provisions regarding the recipient of the revenue.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
TRD states agricultural product transport vehicles do not qualify for the current overweight
permits available under Section 66-7-413 NMSA 1978, since those permits are allowed only for
“nondivisible" loads. Nondivisible loads are loads that cannot be partially unloaded to meet
normal weight limitations. TRD states it is difficult to gauge the weight of agricultural product
loads when products are loaded in the field, and the relatively small 5,000 pound overweight
allowance would provide a reasonable degree of tolerance for loads slightly in excess of weight
limitations. However, since the proposed legislation also allows these vehicles to bypass ports of
entry, it is difficult to see how the 5,000 pound threshold would be monitored. TRD states
agricultural transport vehicles might frequently run at weights well in excess of the 5,000 pound
overweight threshold.
RPG/bb