Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Ulibarri
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/26/08
1/31/08 HB
SHORT TITLE Cibola County Substance Abuse Treatment
SB 334/aSPAC
ANALYST Wilson
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
$10,000.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to but is not included in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Corrections Department (CD)
Department of Health (DOH)
Human Services Department (HSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Senate Public Affairs Committee Amendment
SPAC amendment to SB 334 changes the appropriation’s requirement from a substance abuse
treatment facility in Cibola county to substance abuse services in Cibola and McKinley counties
and a feasibility study for an appropriate substance abuse treatment facility in Cibola county.
The amendment also appropriates the funds to the Human Services Department instead of the
Department of Health.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 334 appropriates $10,000,000 from the general fund to the Department of Health for
expenditure in fiscal year 2009 for a substance abuse treatment facility in Cibola County to
service the northwest part of the state, including McKinley County.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 334/aSPAC– Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $10,000,000 contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general fund.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2009 shall revert
to the general fund.
The fiscal impact on the Medicaid program is dependent on the actual services delivered, and the
eligibility of the individuals receiving those services. Currently, Medicaid does not pay for adult
residential substance abuse treatment and a limited amount of outpatient substance abuse
treatment. However, a large number of New Mexicans experience co-occurring substance use
disorders and mental illness. Therefore, the extent to which expenditures may be matched with
federal Medicaid dollars is unknown.
HSD and DOH suggest that the appropriation, as currently written, will be made to DOH, but it
may be more appropriate to have the money go to the HSD for administration by its Behavioral
Health Services Division.
Appropriations for capital expenditures for a county-owned facility are typically submitted as
part of a capital outlay request.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Behavioral health programmatic expenditures are administered through the Interagency
Behavioral Health Purchasing Collaborative (Collaborative), which ensures that contracts for
treatment services are appropriate and effective. Both HSD and DOH are members of the
Behavioral Health Collaborative and engaged in planning, implementing and monitoring
services, including bed capacity throughout the state. DOH has responsibility for licensing of a
variety of facilities in New Mexico.
The nature of this treatment facility in this bill is not specified. The services to be provided are
not specified so their effectiveness cannot be evaluated. Although SB334 does not specify
whether the facility is meant to provide services to children, adolescents or adults, the state
substance abuse authority is Behavioral Health Services Division within the HSD. If the facility
is meant to serve children, the analysis of Children, Youth and Families Department should be
additionally considered.
DOH notes that the bill is unclear regarding its purpose(s): is the appropriation for programmatic
activities or for capital outlay.
CD states it is possible that this bill could ultimately benefit the CD fiscally. The available
substance abuse treatment may lead to fewer drug and alcohol-related crimes and convictions in
that part of the state. It may also provide individuals on parole or probation with the resources
needed to reduce their likelihood of committing new crimes or violating their conditions of
probation or parole. Thus, the bill could possibly decrease the prison population and probation
and parole caseloads, but this is obviously very difficult to predict with certainty.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
DOH has responsibility for licensing of a variety of facilities in New Mexico. The nature of this
treatment facility is not specified.
HSD staff would have to be involved in the implementation of the provisions of this bill.
DW/mt