Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Jennings
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/25/08
HB
SHORT TITLE Insufficient Indian Health Care Lawsuit
SB 270
ANALYST Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
$500.0
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to SB270 and HB120
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Indian Affairs Department (IAD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 270 appropriates $500.0 thousand from the GENERAL FUND to the Office of the
Attorney General) for the purpose of preparing and filing a lawsuit against the United States for
failure to provide sufficient funding for Indian health care.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Attorney General explains that it is uncertain whether, if the bill passes, and the Attorney
General does bring suit, the funds appropriated will be sufficient to cover the costs of the
litigation.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The Attorney General points out that if construed as a mandate by the State Legislature to
maintain this lawsuit, as opposed to merely providing funding should the Attorney General
pg_0002
Senate Bill 270 – Page
2
determine that the suit is required, the bill may implicate Article III, Section 1 of the New
Mexico Constitution (commonly referred to as the “separation of powers clause") as a possible
unlawful intrusion by the Legislative Branch of government into the managerial and
discretionary duties of a member of the Executive Branch of government.
Even if the bill is construed to mandate this litigation, several legal issues must be overcome. It
remains to be determined whether the state has standing to bring such a suit, on whose behalf the
suit will be brought (i.e. the state itself, individuals deprived of health care due to the stated lack
of “sufficient funding" or on behalf of the various Tribes, Nations, or Pueblos); whether the
United States has waived its sovereign immunity allowing such a suit; whether an adequate case
or controversy exists in order to maintain the suit; whether the facts would support such a suit;
who the proper parties would be, etc.
Indian Affairs Department reports that the federal Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976
(“IHCIA") reaffirmed the US federal trust responsibility, established by treaties, legislation,
executive orders, and court rulings, to provide health care services to Native Americans. The
enactment of the IHCIA was in response to evidence of inadequate funding for Indian health care
services and the huge health disparities experienced by American Indians at the time. IHCIA was
last reauthorized in 1993 and it has been functioning under continuing resolution since 2000.
However, IHCIA reauthorization is currently pending before the US Congress. The
reauthorization of IHCIA would expand resources and funding available to Native American
communities for health-related services. It would also seek to modernize the Indian health care
system, provide new funding for mental and behavioral health services, as well as create
flexibility within the health care structure, and allow health services to be provided in-home to
elderly Native Americans.
The Indian Health Service (“IHS") is the main provider of health services to American Indians.
However, according to a 2003 report by the US Commission on Civil Rights, IHS operates at 59
percent of what is needed to provide adequate health care. They also found that annual per
capital health expenditures for Native Americans total 60 percent of the amount spent on other
Americans under mainstream health plans. The Commission states that these and other
measurements “express in clear terms that funding levels are inadequate…the conclusion is
unmistakable that current funding levels are far below that necessary to maintain basic health
services and that the federal government has failed to satisfy its explicit trust obligation."
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
The AGO stresses that the bill could be construed as providing funding necessary to bring the
lawsuit referred to if, in the discretion of the Attorney General, such a suit is authorized and the
state has a sufficient interest in maintaining the suit. However, the bill could also be construed as
a mandate to bring such a suit which, if complied with, will require staff resources and time in
prosecuting the litigation.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
SB270 relates to HB120 American Indian Health Care Improvement Act which would seek to
address American Indian health disparities by establishing an American Indian Health Division
within the NM Department of Health. In addition, HB120 would appropriate $15 million dollars
to DOH for distribution for a variety of health care activities.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 270 – Page
3
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
According to IAD, persistent lack of funding may account for the continuing health disparities
experienced by American Indians and Alaska Natives. According to a 2006 IHS report,
American Indians and Alaska Natives face large health disparities when compared to other racial
groups in the US. For example, the IHS reports that American Indians and Alaska Natives have
lower life expectancy and a disproportionate disease burden when compared to all other
Americans. The infant mortality rate among American Indians and Alaska Native is 8.5 per
every 1,000 live births compared to 6.8 per 1,000 for all US races. And, American Indians and
Alaska Natives die at higher rates than the national average from tuberculosis, alcoholism,
vehicular crashes, diabetes, unintentional injuries, homicide, and suicide.
Department of Health offers a local perspective saying that American Indians in New Mexico
have the some of the highest health disparity rates when compared to other racial/ethnic groups
on the following health indicators: mental illness, suicide, alcoholism/drug addiction, cancer,
diabetes, obesity, heart disease. Based on the New Mexico American Indian Health Status Data
Report, 2005 created by the New Mexico Department of Health, the five leading causes of death
in New Mexico affecting the American Indian population (2000-2002) were cancers,
unintentional injuries, diseases of the heart, diabetes, chronic liver diseases, and cirrhosis.
American Indian Infant mortality decreased over the past 10 years but remains higher then all
other ethnic groups (7.2 and 6.1 per 1,000 live births, respectively in 2002). For American Indian
males, the leading types of cancer are prostate, colorectal, lung, kidney and stomach; for
American Indian females the leading types of cancers are breast, colorectal, ovarian, corpus,
uterus and stomach. Within all American Indian groups, shigellosis and campylobacter rates
were higher than those of all the other race/ethnic groups combined. Indian health Service is
under funded by the federal government and does not meet the current health care service needs
of Indian people in the New Mexico.
It also notes that the federal Indian Health Care Improvement Act Amendments of 2007 is
currently being considered by the United States Congress. The United States has a federal trust
responsibility established by treaties, legislation, executive orders, and court rulings to provide
health care services to members of federally recognized tribes. The primary federal agencies
responsible to provide health care for American Indians are the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services and the Indian Health Service (IHS). There are nearly 200,000 American
Indians in New Mexico, making up 10.5% of the state’s population, of which many rely upon
IHS for medical service. Pursuant to its trust responsibility, the federal government enacted the
Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976 (IHCIA), however, the IHCIA expired 14 years
ago and has been operating under continuing resolution since 1993. The federal IHCIA, if
reauthorized, would expand health resources available to American Indian communities to
reduce health disparities.
ALTERNATIVES
Appropriate state agencies could be asked to investigate the issues contemplated by this bill, as
opposed to providing funding to bring suit.
EO/bb