Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR
Martinez
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/22/08
HB
SHORT TITLE
Mental Health Court Resource Replacement
SB 214
ANALYST C. Sanchez
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
$641.6
Recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates, Relates to, Conflicts with, Companion to
SB 63, First District Mental Health Court; HB 48, 1
st
District Mental Health Court; HB 136, 13
th
District Mental Health Court Program.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Department of Correction (DOC)
Bernalillo County Metropolitan Courts (BCMC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
The bill appropriates $223,300 from the general fund to the Bernalillo county metropolitan court
for expenditure in fiscal year 2009 to replace funds and resources for the mental health court in
that court. The bill also appropriates $418,300 from the general fund to First and Eleventh
judicial district courts for expenditure in fiscal year 2009 to expand and enhance the mental
health courts in those districts. All unexpended funds revert to the general fund at the end of
fiscal year 2009.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
According to the AOC, there are several direct cost savings gained through operation of mental
health court programs, as well as several indirect costs that should be realized. The cost of
incarcerating mentally ill offenders in jail will be reduced substantially due to their earlier release
pg_0002
Senate Bill 214 – Page
2
from jail and effective use of existing resources in the community. The costs of treatment while
inmates are incarcerated will be avoided which, while not effecting the individual court’s budget,
will be a cost avoidance for their respective counties, since Medicare/Medicaid benefits stop
while people are incarcerated. Mental Health Court programs drastically reduce the number of
days that mentally ill offenders spend in the hospital receiving psychiatric treatment, which in
turn reduces the cost for the counties since the majority of participants are indigent. Mental
Health Court reduces the number of referrals to the State Psychiatric Hospital, which in turn
results in cost savings for the Department of Health. Mental Health Court programs also reduce
the amount of time that law enforcement spends interacting with mentally ill offenders since only
a small percentage re-offend while participating in Mental Health Court programs.
It is likely that some of the individuals who would be adjudicated under this program would be
Medicaid-eligible recipients. If this were the case, any monies used to provide mental health
services that are part of the State Medicaid benefit package would be eligible for Federal match.
The number of eligible clients and the amount of this impact cannot be readily determined.
The state will likely avoid future costs as the program successfully serves more clients.
The initial cost of the program of $641,600.00
in fiscal year 2009 is subject to increased costs
resulting from any increases in salaries and the costs of benefits for the FTEs.
The following table presents a breakdown of the entire appropriation:
Judicial Unit
MH Court Location
Replacement of
Lapsing Funds
and Resources
Requests
Expansion
and
Enhancement
Requests
First District
Santa Fe Co.
260.2
Eleventh District San Juan Co.
158.1
Bernalillo County
Metropolitan Court Bernalillo Co.
223.3
Subtotals =
223.3
418.3
Total FY09 MH Court Funding Requests =
641.6
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Nationally, estimates are that between 6% and 15% of people that are in jail have serious mental
illnesses. This bill funds mental health programs that reduce the incidents of arrest and
incarceration of repeat offenders with mental illness using the Court to mandate appropriate
treatment rather than incarceration. Mental Health courts are part of the growing national trend
towards therapeutic justice programs, or problem-solving courts, which are modeled on the
nationally successful drug court programs. Like drug courts, mental health courts combine
treatment with the coercive power of the judiciary and close supervision to ensure participants
adhere to the treatment plan and other program requirements.
Clinical profiles of the clients served by mental health courts in New Mexico show the
following:
Major Depressive Disorder: 21%
Bipolar Disorder: 32%
PTSD: 10%
pg_0003
Senate Bill 214 – Page
3
Anxiety Disorder: 8%
Psychotic Disorder (e.g. 26%
Schizophrenia)
Borderline Personality: 2%
Clients on psychotropic medication: 66%
Alcohol/drug use history
Alcohol: 58%
Marijuana: 26%
Cocaine: 36%
Opiates: 3%
Amphetamines: 5%
Prescription medication: 29%
As with drug courts, mental health courts require close collaboration between the courts, the
public defender’s and district attorney’s offices. Because of the time demands of such programs,
mental health court budgets often include funds for all three agencies. Such programs also
require treatment staff, in the form of psychologists or psychiatrists, family counselors, as well as
court staff to administer and run the program who are trained for mental health diversion or
supervised release services.
This appropriation would allow the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court to replace lapsing
federal grant funds that are essential to maintain operations at their current 150 participant
capacity. It would also allow the First and Eleventh Judicial Districts to expand and enhance
their existing Mental Health Court programs. Both programs at the First and at the Eleventh were
started with volunteer services, donated staff time and supplies. The First has also benefited from
a $50,000 grant from the city of Santa Fe. The city grant will not be renewed for FY09 due to
fiscal pressures at the city. Volunteer services can help a program get started but cannot be
depended on for the long term. This appropriation would allow the First and Eleventh to
institutionalize their programs, which otherwise risk shutting down when the city grant and
volunteer services are no longer available.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
FY 08 is the fifth year that the courts are participating in performance based budgeting. This bill
may have an impact on the measures of the district courts in the following areas:
cases disposed as a percentage of cases filed
percent change in case filings by case types
clearance rate
The success of the program will be measured by tracking the success of treatment and
medication compliance and continued checking of court records for recidivism.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
There is an immediate administrative impact on the court resulting from added judicial and staff
time needed to dispose of these types of cases in keeping with the dictates of the mental health
court program. Over the long term, successful treatment of program participants should lead to a
decrease in court workload as such participants recover sufficiently to lead more normal, law-
abiding lives.
pg_0004
Senate Bill 214 – Page
4
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
The LFC recommendation adopted by HAFC includes $100 thousand for the Eleventh Judicial
District Court and $223.3 thousand for Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court.
SB 214 should be reduced by $323.3 thousand.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The major goal for Mental Health Court is the reduction of criminal conduct by individuals with
a mental health diagnosis. The statistics below demonstrate a reduction of re-arrest rates of
graduates from Mental Health Courts. It is further noted that this reduction of criminal conduct
is particularly significant with respect to serious repeat offenders (defined as individuals who
have had 3 or more criminal arrests in a 12 month period).
By way of example, in fiscal year 2005, there were 68 graduates from the Mental Health Court
program in Bernalillo County. Of these graduates, 48 had less than 3 criminal charges filed
against them during the 12 months preceding their graduations, respectively. The remaining 20
graduates had 3 or more charges filed during that same period. Therefore, the percentage of
graduates with less than 3 criminal charges filed during the preceding 12 month period was 71%
with the remaining 29% of the graduates constituting repeat offenders.
These graduation rates set forth in the chart below reflect that 49 of the 68 graduates (or
approximately 72%) had no criminal arrests in the year following their graduations.
Furthermore, the rate of serious repeat offenders was reduced from 20 cases (approximately
29%) to 4 cases (approximately 6%).
Number of Charges
O
F
F
E
N
D
E
R
S
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court will lose a significant portion of their program funding,
leading to a severe reduction in capacity. The programs at the First and the Eleventh also risk
shutting down from lack of recurring funding.
0
1
2
3
4
5 6 7 8 9 10+
TOTAL
12 months
prior to
graduation
0
37
11
9
7
3
0
0
1
0
0
68
TOTAL 37 11 9 7 3 0 0 1 0 0 68
12 months
post
graduation
49
12
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTA L 49
had
no
New
arrest
12
had
one
arrest
3 had
two
arrests
2 had
three
arrests
2 had
four
arrests
No
new
arrest
No
new
arrest
No
new
arrest
No
new
arrest
No
new
arrest
No
new
arrest
Recidivism Rates for fiscal year 2005 for Mental Health Court Graduates
pg_0005
Senate Bill 214 – Page
5
In addition, mentally ill offenders will remain in jail longer than required due to insufficient staff
to arrange for aftercare. Untreated or inadequately treated mentally ill offenders will likely re-
offend. The program will reduce the number of mentally ill offenders who are jailed repeatedly.
. . “The revolving door." This occurrence increases the risk to the community and perpetuates
chronic re-entry into the criminal justice system.
CS/jp