Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Beffort
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/25/08
HB
SHORT TITLE Non-Resident College Student Health Insurance
SB 38
ANALYST Haug
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Conflict with SB3
Relationship to SB37
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Higher Education Department (HED)
New Mexico Health Policy Commission (HPC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 38 requires nonresident students to provide proof of health insurance as a condition
of admission to a postsecondary educational institution. In Senate Bill 38, the term "nonresident
student" is as defined by the New Mexico Higher Education Department (NMHED) pursuant to
Subsection G of Section 21-1-4 NMSA 1978. If passed, the effective date of this act would be
7/1/2008.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Senate Bill 38 has no fiscal impact.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The HED states that Senate Bill 38 requires NMHED to establish criteria and guidelines for a
nonresident student to provide proof of appropriate health insurance. Senate Bill38 requires
pg_0002
Senate Bill 38 – Page
2
proof of health insurance prior to nonresident student admission. The bill states that nonresident
students shall not be admitted to public postsecondary institutions unless:
They can provide proof of being covered by a health insurance policy or plan that
provides substantially the same or greater coverage than a health insurance policy or plan
generally offered to students by the institution; or
They purchase coverage under the health insurance policy or plan generally offered to
students by the institution.
The HED notes that Senate Bill 38 may help to contain student health care costs. For example,
per the University of New Mexico (UNM) Student Health Center Director, currently, students
are not required to have health insurance to receive services at the center; and, 50% of students
who receive services do not have health insurance. Requiring health insurance could help defray
rising student health care costs. Alternately, making health insurance coverage a condition of
admission, may adversely impact educational access and affordability. For example, per the
UNM Student Health Center Director, in a recent random student survey, 70% of students polled
felt that having appropriate health insurance was an affordability issue. Senate Bill 38 could have
an adverse impact on postsecondary institution enrollment numbers, consequently impacting
institution funding as the NMHED funding formula is based on enrollment.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The HED states that since Senate Bill 38 requires the NMHED to establish appropriate criteria
and guidelines for a nonresident student to provide proof of health insurance, designated staff
would need to be well versed in institution student admission policies and have substantial
knowledge of the health care system and best practices. If SB3 (Health Security Act) or a similar
bill is enacted, coordination would be necessary with the new Health Security Commission or
other group formed to support implementation.
CONFLICT, RELATIONSHIP
The HED points out that SB38 conflicts somewhat with SB3, the Health Security Act,
specifically to Section 22 which requires educational institutions to purchase health insurance
coverage under the health security plan for its nonresident students, through fees assessed to
those students. SB3 further states that the governing body of the educational institution shall set
the fees at the amount determined by the Health Security Act Commission. SB3 also describes
how a nonresident student may satisfy the requirement for health care coverage: by proof of
coverage under a policy or plan in another state that is acceptable to the commission. In this case,
the student would not be assessed a fee.
Additionally, SB38 requires NMHED to establish criteria and guidelines for a nonresident
student to provide proof of appropriate health insurance. This conflicts with SB3 which states
that the Health Security Act Commission shall adopt rules to determine proof of an individual's
eligibility for the health security plan or a student's proof of nonresident health care coverage.
Senate Bill 38 is related to Senate Bill 37 which requires resident students to provide proof of
health insurance prior to postsecondary institution admission.
pg_0003
Senate Bill 38 – Page
3
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The HPC states:
Currently three states - Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Idaho - require college students
to have insurance coverage. (Source: Insurance Options for College Students in Texas: A
study of Student Health Insurance Plans, Texas Department of Insurance November
2005.)
Massachusetts
The statute requiring college students to carry health insurance in Massachusetts has been
in place since 1989. It requires all students attending college three-fourths of full-time or
more to have coverage in a qualifying student health insurance program offered through
their college or an alternate plan with comparable coverage.
New Jersey
In 1991, the New Jersey Legislature passed legislation requiring all full-time students in
public and private institutions of higher education to have health insurance coverage. In
addition, it required all institutions of higher education to make student health insurance
plans available to their students.
Idaho
In 2002, the Idaho Board of Education implemented regulations requiring public, four-
year universities to offer student health insurance and all full-time students at such
institutions to maintain health insurance coverage.
In addition, the governing boards of large university systems have instituted coverage
requirements in Montana, California, Illinois, and Minnesota. Finally, many individual
schools have chosen to require insurance for students. (Source: Insurance Options for
College Students in Texas: A study of Student Health Insurance Plans, Texas Department
of Insurance November 2005, page 15.)
Nationally, about 90 percent of private colleges
and 25 percent of public universities mandate health insurance coverage for students.
GH/nt