Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR HTPW
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/7/2008
HB 656
SHORT TITLE Public Peace, Health, Safety & Welfare
SB
ANALYST Moser
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
FY10
$0.1
$0.1
Recurring
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 656 broadens the definition of a regional transit system within the Regional Transit
District Act (RTDA) to include “…a street, road, highway and bridge that is of regional or
district significance, in a district whose geographic area includes a class A county with a
population greater than five hundred thousand…" The Regional Transit District Act (RTDA)
presently defines a regional transit system as being “a property, improvement or system designed
to be compatible with established state and local transportation plans that transports or conveys
passengers within a region by means of a high occupancy vehicle including an automobile, truck,
bus, van or railcar."
pg_0002
House Bill 656 – Page
2
This amendment will expand the uses of any tax imposed by the regional transit district (RTD) to
include streets, roads, highways and bridges that are of regional or district significance.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
House Bill 656 would allow imposition of not less than 1/16
th
percent and not more than ½
percent county regional transit gross receipts tax in a qualifying district. Currently the only
qualifying RTD would be composed of Bernalillo, Sandoval, and Valencia counties. This RTD
has not chosen in the past to impose such the county regional transit gross receipts tax. The
timing of this fiscal impact will depend on when and if the board of directors of the district
passes a resolution directing each county to impose the tax, and when and if the voters of the
three counties approve imposition of the tax.
The table below illustrates the revenue that would be generated if a 1/8 percent increment were
imposed in FY09 based upon the most recent data provided by the Taxation and Revenue
Department. In FY09, these three counties will have combined taxable gross receipts totaling
$20 billion in FY09. A 1/8 percent tax on that amount would yield $25.1 million.
Illustration of Potential Revenue from Additional County Local Option Increments - Fiscal Year
2009
County
FY09 Taxable
Gross Receipts
Potential Revenue: 1/8% County Regional Transit GRT
Increment
Bernalillo
$17,471,824,545
21,839,781
Sandoval
$1,820,394,040
2,275,493
Valencia
$783,790,951
979,739
Total
$20,076,009,536
25,095,012
Source: Taxation and Revenue Department, Office of Research and Statistics
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
House Bill 656 by modifying the definition of a regional transit system to include roads,
highways and bridges of regional significance creates the opportunity for local option taxes to be
imposed, after approval by the electorate, for improvement and construction of highway projects
within the district. This creation of local option taxes for highway programs was one of the
recommendations presented by the House Memorial 35 task force in 2007.
With this addition, the Regional Transit District Board could develop a proposal for a gross
receipts tax increase or a bond to fund a package of transportation improvements including both
road and public transportation projects.
In addition to allowing local option taxes this amendment would allows for the imposition of
tolls on roads within the district. Tolling previously was restricted to public transportation
systems under this act.
New Mexico’s municipalities and counties are authorized to impose over 4 percent of local
option gross receipts taxes (that figure excludes several additional local option taxes that have
pg_0003
House Bill 656 – Page
3
been authorized for selected local governments). Due to increasing imposition of local option
taxes, the statewide gross receipts tax rate is increasing steadily. On average, a local option gross
receipts tax of about 1.9 percent will be imposed by local governments statewide by FY09.
Combined with the state gross receipts tax of 5 percent, the statewide tax rate is therefore 6.9
percent.
The relationship with the NMDOT regarding the Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan
and its coordination with a RTD plan on highway improvements needs to be reviewed as part of
this bill as the timing and funding of projects may be impacted.
GM/bb