Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Gonzales
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
01/27/08
HB 369
SHORT TITLE Taos County Long-Term Alcohol Treatment
SB
ANALYST Geisler
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
$140.0
Recurring
General
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to: HB 368
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Human Services Department (HSD)
Department of Health (DOH)
Corrections Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 369 would appropriate $140,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Health
(DOH) in fiscal year 2009 to contract for long-term drug and alcohol rehabilitation in Taos
County. Any unexpended balance remaining at the end of FY09 shall revert to the General
Fund.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Behavioral Health Services are now managed out of the Human Services Department (HSD),
since the behavioral health services division was transferred from DOH at the start of FY08.
HSD notes that HB 369 is not included as part of the behavioral health collaborative priorities or
strategic plan and is not included in the Governor’s FY09 executive Budget. A similar request
with an appropriation for $50,000 to DOH was introduced in the 2007 legislative session and
was incorporated into SB 611. The appropriation was included as a Special Appropriations line
item in the FY08 ValueOptions New Mexico contract with no administrative costs.
pg_0002
House Bill 369 – Page
2
HSD notes that the bill does not specify what type of long-term alcohol and substance abuse
treatment services would be provided, and how much of the appropriation would be used for
non-treatment services. It is therefore not possible to assess whether the proposals are likely to
be effective or to assist in recovery and resilience.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
DOH notes that in Taos County in 2003, 43% of all fatal motor vehicle crashes involved alcohol
(Office of NM Vital Records and Health Statistics; 2003 data is most recent). Taos County ranks
8th highest in the state for alcohol-related (AR) deaths, 7th for AR chronic disease deaths, 5th for
AR motor vehicle crash deaths, 8th for adult binge drinking and chronic/heavy drinking, 3rd for
adult drinking and driving, 6th for youth binge drinking, 5th for youth drinking and driving, and
1st for youth drug use (New Mexico SPF-SIG State Epidemiology Profile, Spring 2005).
DOH also states that HB 369 would be strengthened by clarifying the intended target population,
the specific type of services to be contracted, and the specific treatment approach to be used.
Currently, all behavioral health treatment resources are administered by the Human Services
Department through a single behavioral health entity. Tri County Community Services provides
behavioral health services in Taos and Colfax Counties. Tri County Community Services also
provides out-patient alcohol and substance abuse treatment services and social detoxification
services in Taos.
RELATIONSHIP
HB 369 relates to HB 368, which would appropriate $84,600 for Alcohol Treatment Services in
Talpa, Taos County.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Corrections notes that if the bill enables Taos area residents to receive long-term receive
alcohol/drug treatment and care, it reduces the likelihood that certain individuals will commit
new crimes (while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, in order to get money to buy more
drugs or alcohol, etc.). Thus, it could indirectly lead to fewer convictions, and thus a decrease in
the Department’s prison population. Further, by providing treatment services, it could give
individuals on probation or parole in the Taos area another coping mechanism to use to avoid
committing new crimes and committing violations of their conditions of probation/ parole. This
could also cause a decrease in the Department’s probation/parole caseloads. The contract/private
prison annual cost of incarcerating an inmate is $25,455 per year for males. The cost per client
to house a female inmate at a privately operated facility is $25,805 per year.
AMENDMENT
On line 17, strike Department of Health and replace with Human Services Department.
GG/bb