Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Fox-Young
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
01/25/08
HB 307
SHORT TITLE Revenue to Cities Imposing Civil Motor Fines
SB
ANALYST Escudero
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
Fund
FY08
FY09
FY10
or Non-Rec
Affected
$20,700.0 $15,000.0 Recurring General Fund
($20,700.0) ($15,000.0) Recurring City Government
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases) For further reference to this table refer to DFA Analysis, page 1.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Tax and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 307 reduces gross receipts distributions on a dollar-for-dollar basis to communities
with red light programs using civil rather than criminal penalties for violation of the motor
vehicle code. Albuquerque is currently the only city in the State of New Mexico with a red light
camera program. The money not sent to Albuquerque is distributed to the General Fund. The
overall withheld amount would be about equal to the total penalties collected in Albuquerque
Albuquerque has adopted a municipal ordinance that recognizes certain traffic offenses as
nuisance’s subject only to civil municipal fines and not required to be filed in court as
traffic citations.
HB 307 requires that under this scheme, and any similar scheme adopted by any
municipality, the amount of gross receipts tax revenue otherwise due to the municipality
under NMSA 1978, Section 7-1-6.4 will be reduced by the amount of revenues collected
by the municipality under the civil/nuisance traffic scheme.
pg_0002
House Bill 307 – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
As stated by AOC, the net result is that the amount of revenues collected by the municipality
under its civil/nuisance traffic program will be placed into the general fund by diverting to the
general fund that amount from the gross receipts tax revenue that would otherwise have been due
to the municipality
Upon annual determination by the Secretary of the Department of Finance and Administration of
the amount of revenue collected by a municipality from its civil/nuisance traffic program, the
general fund will be increased by that amount by transfer to the general fund of that amount from
the gross receipts revenues that would otherwise have been due to the municipality.
The fines and penalties collected by Albuquerque would remain with Albuquerque but under HB
307, gross receipts distributions to Albuquerque would be reduced by the same amount. The
reduction to Albuquerque would be redistributed to the General Fund and would be available for
appropriation.
According to DFA, this is a table of revenue estimates for the automated enforcement program
from the 2008 Mayor's report which provides a basis for fine collections estimates with an
assumption of current fees, that the remainder of FY08 matches the first half and growth
consistent with that from FY07 to FY08.
fine collection est. | growth rate | Pre bond/TIDD adj impact
FY07 9,050.4
FY08 11,648.6 28.7%
FY09 14,992.7 28.7% 20,699.0 prior two years
FY10 19,296.8 28.7% 14,992.7 prior year
FY11 24,836.6 28.7% 19,296.8 prior year
FY12 31,966.7 28.7% 24,836.6 prior year
This analysis assumes that the Speed and Speed Van related collections are included in
civil penalties from the STOP automated enforcement program. If fees are reduced to
$69, as proposed, and the change went into effect for FY09, the overall impact from
FY10 forward would be reduced about half.
Analysis of potential adjustments to impacts from pre-2/1/08 GRT pledged revenue bond
payment requirements and a TIDD municipal dedication is ongoing.
From the City of Albuquerque FY08 budget, the city received 341,597.0 in gross receipts
tax, with 88.5 totals in state share gross receipts tax bonds with maturities from 2001 to
2022 and 26.0 in repayments, and an overall surplus of 6.0 according to LGD.
The bill proposes a temporary provision for the first year determination to be based on
the prior two years, with subsequent year's determination based on one prior year. The
bill would take effect with a July 1, 2008 determination affecting FY09 municipal
distributions.
According to TRD, this bill provides for a reduced distribution of gross receipts tax revenue to
certain
municipalities that impose civil, rather than criminal, penalties of violation of the Motor
Vehicle Code or the municipality’s traffic code.
On July 1 of each year, the Secretary of Finance and Administration must determine the
pg_0003
House Bill 307 – Page
3
amount in civil penalties, fines or other assessment collected during the previous fiscal
year by the municipality for violations of the Motor Vehicle Code or the municipality’s
traffic code. The Secretary must notify the secretary of taxation and revenue of that
determination. Unless the municipality has issued revenue bonds prior to February 1,
2008, that are secured by the pledge of all or part of the municipality’s revenue from the
distribution made under this section, subsequent distributions in the current fiscal year to
the municipality shall be withheld until the total amount of withheld distributions equals
the amount determined by the secretary of finance and administration.
If the municipality has issued revenue bonds as noted above, until the total amount of
withheld distributions equals the amount determined by the secretary of finance and
administration, the amount distributed to the municipality in the current fiscal year shall
be equal to the lesser of:
the amount sufficient to meet any required payment due on the revenue bonds; or
the amount that would otherwise be distributed to the municipality except for the
provisions described above.
A distribution shall be made to the state general fund in an amount equal to the amount of
distributions withheld pursuant to the above formula.
Effective Date: Not specified; 90 days following adjournment (May 14, 2008).
Estimated Revenue Impact*
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY 08-12
R or
NR**
Fund(s) Affected
None (20,000) (10,000) (10,000) (10,000) (50,000) R City of Albuquerque
None 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 R State General Fund
0
0
0
0
0
0
R
Total Taxes
* In thousands of dollars. Parentheses ( ) indicate a revenue loss. ** Recurring (R) or Non-Recurring (NR).
The City of Albuquerque has received roughly $10 million per year in fines associated with civil
penalties imposed on “red light" and speeding traffic violations. Of that amount, approximately
$5 million per year is spent on administration of the street intersection camera program.
The 1.225% portion of state gross receipts tax shared with the City is pledged toward revenue
bonds, but the Department has no information regarding debt service payment schedules on those
bonds. Presumably the $170+ million per year of 1.225% shared revenue distributed to
Albuquerque would be sufficient to cover both the debt service payments and the fiscal impact
shown above.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
THIS BILL ANALYSIS IS SUBMITTED BY THE AOC AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS
A SUBMISSION BY THE SUPREME COURT OR ANY OTHER COURT.
It should be noted that HB 307 makes no provision for deducting the costs of running a
civil/nuisance traffic program from the gross receipts reduction. The reduction in a
municipality’s gross receipts revenue is set at the amount “collected" under by the civil/nuisance
traffic program.
pg_0004
House Bill 307 – Page
4
As stated by DFA, HB 307 will give the State additional revenues to distribute to other areas of
the state. HB 307 makes the State of New Mexico vulnerable to a huge lawsuit on the grounds
that it compromises the effectiveness of Albuquerque's home rule charter. If the state is charged
with effectively penalizing and compromising a home rule charter initiative, the effectiveness of
the home rule option is questioned for other municipalities with home rule or considering
adapting home rule.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
As stated by DFA, HB 307 presents the potential to lessen or eliminate the surplus Albuquerque
currently enjoys in its general fund budget. The mayor of Albuquerque may see HB 307 as a
threat to the financial viability of the red light program even though it appears to be reducing
accidents in Albuquerque. The result may be for Albuquerque to kill the red light program
completely in order to boost GRT distributions.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
A small adverse administrative burden on the Department would result from intercepting
variable monthly revenue amounts from Albuquerque and redirecting them to the General Fund.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The consequences of not enacting HB 307 will be to allow Albuquerque to exercise its options
unfettered under its home rule charter.
PME/nt