Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR HJC
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/23/08
2/14/08 HB CS/227/aSJC/aSFL
SHORT TITLE
Domestic Abuse Procedure Changes
SB
ANALYST C. Sanchez
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY08
FY09
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY08
FY09
FY10
3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring or
Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
Indeterminable
*See Narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court (BCMC)
Public Defender (PD)
Children Youth and Families (CYFD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFL amendment
The Senate Floor amendment makes technical changes to the original bill.
The amendment has no fiscal impact.
Synopsis of SJC amendment
On page 10, lines 24 and 25, the Senate Judiciary Committee amendment strikes “visitation and
temporary support" and inserts in lieu thereof “and visitation".
pg_0002
CS/House Bill 227/aSJC/aSFL – Page
2
The amendment has no fiscal impact.
Synopsis of Bill
The proposed House Judiciary Committee substitute HB 227 would make the following changes
to the original HB 227 bill:
would not require the alleged victim of domestic abuse, under Section 40-13-3.1 NMSA
1978, to bear the cost of witness fees, including expert witnesses; however, a law
enforcement officer would be barred from charging a witness fee for appearing at a
hearing pursuant to the Family Violence Protection Act;
would amend Section 40-13-4 NMSA to allow a court that has granted a temporary order
of protection to award custody, visitation and temporary support; and
would amend the section to the Family Violence Protection Act regarding limitations on
internet publication of information relating to, among other things, the issuance and
registration protection orders.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There will be minimal cost to the Judicial Information Division to change programming of the
Case Look-Up System so that the public no longer has access to the courts database system of
orders of protection. The courts were planning to remove access prior to the introduction of this
bill.
There will be costs associated with creating legal forms and definitions for the new orders of
protection for non-household member victims and perpetrators of stalking, sexual assault and
cyberstalking as well as costs associated with changing all current standard forms to comply with
changes in statutory language relating to identity of the parties and training for court staff, judges
hearing officers and law enforcement
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Often victims are unable to leave an abusive relationship due the economic abuse imposed by
perpetrators who do not provide the victim knowledge of or access to family income. The bill's
amended language would clarify that an alleged victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or
stalking is not required to bear any costs related to the petitioning, filing, and prosecution of a
misdemeanor or felony offense.
Under the proposed bill, the definition of domestic abuse would be amended to include
“incidents of stalking, cyber stalking or sexual assault whether committed by household member
or not." The expansion in the definition allows victims of alleged sexual assault and/or stalking
to seek orders of protection. According to data from the New Mexico Interpersonal Data Central
Repository on the Incidence and Nature of Domestic Violence in New Mexico VII
, law
enforcement reported 245,631 incidents of stalking in 2005, with 44% of these individuals
reporting that they were injured as a result of the incident. In addition, respondents to the
Statewide Victimization Survey, regardless of race or ethnic category, report that violent, crime,
domestic violence, sexual assault, sexual harassment, and stalking are more of a problem for
women today.
pg_0003
CS/House Bill 227/aSJC/aSFL – Page
3
CYFD currently uses this definition to determine individual eligibility for domestic violence
services. CYFD would need to adjust the language in the current Domestic Violence Service
Definition manual to reference only domestic abuse against household members, and to ensure
the inclusion of the revised definition of sexual assault and stalking contained in this bill would
not negatively impact CYFD domestic violence programs. Funding for sexual assault programs
is administered through the Department of Health.
The bill also seeks to place limitations on access to the New Mexico Judiciary’s website that has
provided public information relating to domestic violence orders of protection, but mandating the
courts remove public access to information about the identity and physical location of the victims
in these cases.
The bill amends and clarifies certain language used in the Family Violence Protection Act to
more uniformly describe the parties to the actions, and to mirror language in the act on payment
of costs associated with orders of protection to the amendments to the criminal code on the same
issue.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The courts will have to design, provide and publish new forms and legal processes for non-
household member victims and perpetrators of stalking, cyberstalking and sexual assault and
modify existing programming of the case look-up system to block public access to statewide files
on orders of protection.
CONFLICT
HB 312
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The criminal code of New Mexico does not define a crime known as “cyberstalking", nor is it
defined in the proposed amendments to the Family Violence Protection Act.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The proposed amendments to the Family Violence Protection Act also include new mandates to
law enforcement to advise victims that they have a right to file a criminal complaint; and that
they notify victims of crimes (as those are defined under the act) anytime an alleged perpetrator
(not just a household members) is released from detention and that when an alleged perpetrator is
arrested that law enforcement include in the written report of the incident leading to arrest, a
statement that the arrestee was the “predominant aggressor".
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Status quo. The state will continue to be in conflict with Violence Against Women Act funding
requirements because of the current language in our law which could jeopardize eligibility for
future grant funds coming into the state and current funding levels over 5 million dollars.
CS/mt:bb