Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR
Park
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
3/20/07
3/22/07 HB 5/aHJC/aHFL
SHORT TITLE
Increase Domestic Violence Penalties
SB
ANALYST C. Sanchez
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
$.1
$.1
$.1 Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
*Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Court (AOC)
Public Defender (PD)
Corrections Department (CD)
*Responses received for request for analysis from the following duplicate bills introduced in the
Forty-Eighth Legislature, First Session: HB 620, as amended is identical to House Bill 5.
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HFL Amendment
The House Floor amendment clarifies language relating to provisions that suspend or defer a
sentence.
Synopsis of HJC Amendment
The House Judiciary Committee amendment reduces the minimum sentence for battery, against a
household member, from thirty days to fifteen days for a third offense, and from six months to
ninety days for a fourth offense.
Lastly, the amendment increases the minimum sentence for aggravated battery, against a
household member, from forty-eight hours to seventy-two hours for a second offense.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 5 requires mandatory jail sentences and treatment after the first conviction for Battery
Against a Household Member Section 30-3-15 NMSA 1978 and Aggravated Battery Against a
Household Member Section 30-3-16 NMSA 1978.
pg_0002
House Bill 5/aHJC/aHFL – Page
2
Section 1: Battery Against a Household Member
Beginning with the second offense, the sentence must include mandatory jail time that cannot be
suspended, deferred, or taken under advisement. See table below. The sentence must also
include participation and completion of a domestic violence treatment program as defined in 34-
15-2 NMSA 1978. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, if a sentence was suspended or
deferred, probation may extend up to 364 days plus 90 days.
Offense
Degree
Mandatory Jail Time
First
Misdemeanor
Not specified
Second
Misdemeanor
48 hours
Third
Misdemeanor
30 days
Fourth and subsequent Fourth Degree Felony 6 months
Section 2: Aggravated Battery Against a Household Member NMSA 1978
Beginning with the second offense, the sentence must include mandatory jail time that cannot be
suspended, deferred, or taken under advisement. See table below. The sentence must also include
participation and completion of a domestic violence treatment program as defined in 34-15-2
NMSA 1978. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary, if a sentence was suspended or deferred,
probation may extend up to 364 days plus 90 days.
Offense
Degree
Mandatory Jail Time
First
Misdemeanor
None
Second
Misdemeanor
48 hours
Third
Misdemeanor
30 days
Fourth and subsequent Fourth Degree Felony 6 months
House Bill 5 requires all persons convicted of battery or aggravated battery of a household
member to complete a domestic violence offender treatment program. The bill requires that this
treatment program be approved the by the Children, Youth, and Families Department instead of
being based on Section 34-15-2(D) NMSA 1978.
The effective date of this law is July 1, 2007.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no appropriation in this bill. This bill will have several fiscal implications on the
Corrections Department. By increasing the penalties and requiring imprisonment the number of
domestic violence offenders incarcerated in New Mexico prisons is likely to increase. Because
only repeat offenders are required to serve long sentences the increase is not expected to be
great. Because none of the mandatory sentences exceed a year, most incarceration time served
will be in County jails and not state prisons. The largest impact of this bill is likely to be felt by
the Probation/Parole Division. People convicted of these crimes are likely to be supervised by
the Adult Probation/Parole Division. This will increase caseloads. Extending sentences past 364
days will also increase caseloads because probationers will remain on probation for a longer
period of time. The mandatory treatment provisions will increase the level of supervision in
many instances. Higher supervision levels require more man-hours per probationer. Making
offenses felonies instead of misdemeanors would also mandate a parole period. This will also
pg_0003
House Bill 5/aHJC/aHFL – Page
3
increase caseloads for the Probation/Parole division, which supervises parolees. Some District
Courts have a special probation officer who acts under the direction of the court and not the
Corrections Department. These outside probation officers will reduce some of the impact. It is
also likely that some of these offenders will be placed on unsupervised probation, which will also
lessen the impact on the Corrections Department.
Any fiscal impact on the judiciary would be proportional to the enforcement of this law and
commenced prosecutions. There may be an increase in the amount of work that needs to be done
by the courts, thus requiring additional resources to handle increase.
There will be a minimal administrative cost for statewide update, distribution and documentation
of statutory changes. Any additional fiscal impact on the judiciary would be proportional to the
enforcement of this law and commenced prosecutions. New laws, amendments to existing laws
and new hearings have the potential to increase caseloads in the courts, thus requiring additional
resources to handle the increase.
Furthermore, as is in DWI cases, more court time will be needed to prove prior convictions,
leading to longer trials and the need for additional resources.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
This bill makes a jail time mandatory for each conviction and limits judicial sentencing
discretion. Persons convicted of this offense must also successfully complete a domestic violence
offender treatment program as part of their sentence. It is unknown if there are sufficient
treatment programs in all regions of the state to meet this requirement.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
The courts are participating in performance based budgeting. This bill may impact the courts’
performance based budgeting measures, which may result in a need for additional resources. For
example, the district court’s performance measure clearance rates may be impacted if increased
penalties lead to an increased demand for jury trials and fewer plea bargains, thereby increasing
the amount of judge and clerk time needed to dispose of cases.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Overall, passage of this bill is not likely to have significant performance implications for the
Corrections Department or the judiciary.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Status Quo
CS/mt:csd