Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Nava
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
3/02/2007
3/12/2007 HB
SHORT TITLE Area Applications on Crops Near Schools
SM 52/aSRC
ANALYST Schuss
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total Unknown Unknown
Unknown
Non-
Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Agriculture (DOA)
Public Education Department (PED)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SRC Amendment
The proposed amendment by the Senate Rules Committee requests that the Agriculture Aviation
Association report on the rules regulating aerial applications made to agronomic crops near
schools.
The amendment removes the statement that says the New Mexico Department of Agriculture has
regulatory authority over plant protectants and nutrients applied to agronomic crops.
The amendment removes the request that the New Mexico Department of Agriculture assemble a
work group and requests that the Agriculture Aviation Association report on the rules regulating
aerial applications made to agronomic crops near schools to the appropriate Interim Legislative
Committee no later that November 1, 2007.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Memorial 52 requests that a work group be assembled to evaluate what effects may exist
from aerial applications made to agronomic crops near schools.
pg_0002
Senate Memorial 52/a SRC – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
DOA states that they would incur expenses to assemble and convene the workgroup and collect
the background information necessary for the group to perform a sound evaluation and formulate
any necessary actions.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Senate Memorial 52 states that agriculture is historically and economically important to New
Mexico and its citizens and communities and New Mexico’s children must be provided with a
safe place to obtain an education. Schools may be located in an agriculture community and
various plant protectants and nutrients are applied to agronomic crops.
Children’s exposure to chemicals or toxins that may trigger asthmatic or chemical sensitivity
reactions should be minimized.
The Senate of the State of New Mexico requests that the Director of the New Mexico
Department of Agriculture be requested to assemble a work group to evaluate what effects may
exist from aerial applications made to agronomic crops near schools and formulate precautionary
actions to ensure that children are not being exposed to the products used in aerial applications
during school hours.
The work group should consist of a representative from:
the Department of Health,
the Department of Environment,
the Public Education Department,
the aerial applicator industry,
the Tools for Schools Good Neighbor Program
a local school district and any other members the director feels will add value to the
product
SM 52 also requests that the director report on the progress of the work group to the appropriate
interim legislative committee no later than November 1, 2007.
DOA reports that they are designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as the
state lead agency for pesticides and as such is required to have and exercise adequate authority to
regulate pesticides in the state. DOA has and exercises authority over pesticide applications and
investigates all allegations of pesticide exposure, wherever they may occur. DOA takes action
against applicators, whether aerial or ground, when their actions put persons at risk of exposure.
DOA conducts routine and “for cause" inspections of all aerial applicators and can target
inspections of applications around sensitive areas including schools.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
According to DOA, they would incur expenses in terms of staff time and travel to engage in the
evaluations and workgroup meetings and additional staff would be required to gather and
compile data and information on the types of crops grown, locations of schools, pesticide and
fertilizer use, and other factors necessary to study this.
BS/mt