Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Komadina
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/22/07
03/06/06 HB
SHORT TITLE HPV Vaccine in School Based Health Clinics
SB 1174/aSPAC/aSFl
ANALYST Geisler
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to: SB407a
Relates to Appropriation in the General Appropriation Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Health (DOH)
Public Education Department (PED)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SFl Amendment
The Senate Floor amendment to Senate Bill 1174 clarifies that the parent or guardian of the
student shall be presented information about the link between human papillomavirus and cervical
cancer and the availability of human papillomavirus vaccine. Paragraph A now reads: “Prior to
admission to a public or private school, the parent or guardian of a student nine to fourteen years
of age shall be presented information about the link between human papillomavirus and cervical
cancer and the availability of human papillomavirus vaccine."
Synopsis of SPAC Amendments
The Senate Public Affairs Committee amendments to Senate Bill 1174:
Change the age requirement that the bill applies to from “nine to fourteen years of age" to
“entering the sixth grade."
Paragraph B of the bill now reads: “No female student entering the sixth grade shall be admitted
pg_0002
Senate Bill 1174/aSPAC/aSFl – Page
2
to any private or public school until the student submits to the school written evidence that she
has been vaccinated for human papillomavirus or that, after receiving the information required in
Subsection A of this section, her parent or guardian has elected for her not to receive the
vaccine."
Make a technical correction by striking “school based health clinics" from the preamble since
the legislation contains no reference to school based health clinics.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 1174 would institute a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine school entry
requirement for female students aged nine to fourteen years. Students and their parents would
have the opportunity to opt out of HPV vaccination after having been informed about the
benefits and risks of HPV vaccines. SB 1174 would require the Department of Health to develop
HPV educational materials that would be provided to students and parents to assist them in
making the decision as to whether or not the student should receive the HPV vaccine.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There is no appropriation contained in the bill. DOH notes that both the Executive and
Legislative funding recommendations for the Department of Health include the $945,000
expansion request for HPV vaccine. Based on a revised cost estimate for the vaccine of $97 per
dose, the $945,000 will fund approximately 10,000 doses, covering approximately 3,300 girls.
New Mexico is a “universal vaccine" state meaning that vaccines are provided to all children
regardless of ability to pay. The total estimated population of girls in the age range of 9 to 14
years is 90,000 (approximately 15,000 per year). With current estimates that approximately 15%
of these girls are uninsured, the cost to the Department of Health, if all girls took full advantage
of the vaccine, would be approximately $3,900,000. Costs for the insured population would be
significantly higher at roughly $22,300,000.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Certain human papillomaviruses (HPVs) cause cancer of the uterine cervix and pre-cancerous
changes called “cervical dysplasia". Until recently, there has been no way to prevent HPV
infections that cause cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer. Cervical cancer prevention has
relied entirely upon “Pap smear" screening to detect the cellular abnormalities of cervical
dysplasia and treat the dysplasia before it deteriorates into cervical cancer. Recently, FDA has
licensed a vaccine that is effective in preventing infection with HPV types 16, 18, 6 and 11
responsible for approximately 70 percent of cervical dysplasia and cancer. In the near future, a
second HPV vaccine is expected to be licensed by FDA. Clinical trials data indicate that these
vaccines are highly effective at preventing HPV infections and cervical dysplasia if they are
administered before a young woman becomes infected with these HPVs. Most young women
become infected with these HPVs within several months of initiating sexual activity. These
vaccines have not been demonstrated to be effective in eliminating HPV infections or cervical
dysplasia once a woman has acquired the infections that cause them. Therefore, it is important
that the vaccine be administered before a woman first becomes sexually active. Even though a
woman receives HPV vaccine, she should still receive regular, recommended Pap smears.
It has been demonstrated that school entry requirements for vaccination significantly increase the
pg_0003
Senate Bill 1174/aSPAC/aSFl – Page
3
percentage of the target population that receive the vaccine. In order to promote uniform and
effective implementation of an HPV vaccine program for young adolescent females, it is
advisable that the HPV vaccine should be given to young women at one grade level during a
single school year. Experience with hepatitis B virus vaccination in school aged children
suggests that the most effective policy would be to administer HPV vaccine to girls in the fifth
grade. This policy would focus the vaccination effort on a single age cohort, increasing the
efficiency and effectiveness of program implementation.
There are ethical concerns with making the current HPV vaccines a school entry requirement.
The current vaccine (Gardasil) and the vaccine that is likely to be licensed in the near future
(Cervarix) protect against HPV types 16 and 18, which account for approximately 70 percent of
HPVs associated with cervical dysplasia and cancer of the cervix. The current vaccines available
provide limited protection against the other 30 percent of HPV types that cause cervical cancer
and dysplasia. It is anticipated that HPV vaccines available in the future will protect against
more HPV types and, thereby, protect a higher percentage of women from cervical dysplasia and
cervical cancer. It is unknown if women who have received the current vaccine will be eligible
to receive the new vaccines that protect against more HPV types. The HPV vaccines have been
shown to prevent HPV infections and cervical dysplasia, and it is anticipated therefore that they
will also protect against cervical cancer; however, this has not yet been demonstrated.
Most schools who serve the target age group do not have school-based health centers and
responsibility for ensuring immunization status falls to the school nurse.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
In order to comply with SB 1174, DOH administrative codes governing school immunization
requirements would need to be amended to include HPV vaccine. DOH notes that the title of SB
1174 is "providing for the human papillomavirus vaccine in school-based clinics". While some
schools have access to a school-based health center where shots are given, most do not, and in
those cases HPV shots could be given a) with joint school nurse - public health nurse school
clinics set up for this purpose; b) at the child's provider's office; c) at community clinics using
public health staff. Two of the options would require a significant commitment of public health
staff.
RELATIONSHIP
SB 1174 relates to SB 407a that would mandate insurance and group health coverage for HPV
vaccines for girls between the ages of 9 and 14 years.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
SB 1174 refers to providing for HPV in school-based clinics. However, in the body of the bill,
there is no reference to school-based clinics.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
HPC notes that state laws that require immunization as a condition of enrollment in school
increase the use of vaccines, reduce disease, lessen racial disparities in vaccine coverage and
increase available funding. According to a recent New England Journal of Medicine (December
7, 2006) commentary, "Requiring HPV vaccination by law will almost certainly achieve more
pg_0004
Senate Bill 1174/aSPAC/aSFl – Page
4
widespread protection against the disease than will policies that rely exclusively on persuasion
and education."
Surveys have generally shown that young women are very interested in getting the HPV vaccine,
that parents are willing to have their children vaccinated, and that clinicians are inclined to offer
the vaccine in their practices. Both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and
the American Academy of Pediatrics endorse the use of the vaccine by their members.
ALTERNATIVES
PED provides that if the intent is to require maximum vaccination by the object population,
efforts should be focused on educating that population, providing funding for those families
below the poverty line or who do not have health insurance and striking references to not
admitting girls to public schools.
AMENDMENTS
Page 1, lines 24, delete the following words: “No female student nine to fourteen years of age"
and substitute the following: “No female student entering the sixth grade".
Amend the bill’s title to read “An Act relating to care; providing of the Human Papillomvirus
vaccine for school entry".
GG/nt