Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lovejoy
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/26/2007
3/2/2007 HB
SHORT TITLE Behavioral Health Purchasing Budget
SB 1102/aSPAC
ANALYST Weber
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 727
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Human Services Department (HSD)
Department of Labor (DOL)
Department of Health (DOH)
Children Youth and Families Department (CYFD)
Corrections Department (CD)
No Response Received From
Division of vocational Rehabilitation
Governor’s Commission on Disability
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SPAC Amendment
1. On page 2, line 13 through 18, strike Subsection B in its entirety and insert in lieu thereof the
following new subsection:
"B. The collaborative shall submit, through the human services department, a separate
identifiable consolidated behavioral health budget request. The consolidated behavioral health
budget request shall account for requested funding for the behavioral health services program at
the human services department and any other requested funding for behavioral health services
pg_0002
Senate Bill 1102/aSPAC – Page
2
from agencies identified in Subsection A of this section that will be used pursuant to Paragraph
(5) of Subsection C of this section."
The amendment requires the Collaborative to submit a consolidated behavioral health budget to
the Human Services Department. However, this does not require the appropriation be made to
HSD and it eliminates the requirement to present the budget to the Legislative Finance
Committee and other appropriate hearings. This makes the purpose of a consolidated budget
unclear if it is not for the purpose of a consolidated appropriation or general information for
targeted committees.
Since over 90 percent of the behavioral health budget resides at HSD, it is appropriate to
designate that agency as the information conduit.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 1102 (SB 1102) adds language to §9-7-6.4 NMSA 1978 that updates the Interagency
Behavioral Health Purchasing Collaborative (Collaborative) membership by changing the name
of the Agency on Aging, Office of Indian Affairs, and the Committee on the Concerns of the
Handicapped to their current names. In addition the bill requires the Collaborative to present a
single budget for behavioral health services, representing income and expenses across agencies.
The new language requires each agency that participates in the Collaborative to participate in the
budget preparation, and requires the Collaborative co-chairs to present it before the legislative
finance committee and other appropriate hearings.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
While there would be some fiscal impact but it would be minimal and un-determinate at this
time. In fact, the existing item C (3) in SB1102 requires the collaborative to meet regularly and
inventory all expenditures for behavioral health, including mental health and substance abuse.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The changes should merely formalize the existing requirement to inventory all expenditures for
behavioral health, including mental health and substance abuse. LFC performance audits report
total FY06 Collaborative expenditures through ValueOptions as $300 million. Of this total HSD
is responsible for over $253 million through the Medicaid program. DOH contributes another
$36 million leaving about $11 million from CYFD and Corrections combined. Among the
Collaborative’s responsibilities is to develop a statewide master plan for delivery of services.
Formalizing the budget presentation requirement is essential to development and implementation
of a statewide master plan.
If the proposed transfer of the DOH Behavioral Health Division to HSD takes place over $289
million of the $300 million budget will be in one agency. At this point connecting the
Collaborative state behavioral health policy to the budget will be even more important
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Should the entire behavioral health budget be consolidated and appropriated to one program with
policy development from the Collaborative.
MW/nt