Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR
Grubesic
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/20/07
HB
SHORT TITLE
Employers Subject to Workers’ Comp. Act.
SB
1064
ANALYST C. Sanchez
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
Regulation and Licensing Department (RLD)
Workers Compensation Administration (WCA)
Human Services Department (HSD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 1064 amends NMSA Section 52-1-6A of the Workers’ Compensation Act to
apparently exempt sole proprietors licensed under the provisions of the Construction Industries
Licensing Act from the Workers Compensation Act.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill has no fiscal impact on CID, but it would relieve a large portion of CID’s licensees of
the cost of carrying workers’ compensation insurance.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The section of the Workers Compensation Act amended by this bill applies the Act to “all
employers engaged in activities required to be licensed under the provisions of the Construction
Industries Licensing Act" regardless of the number of employees. “Sole proprietor" is defined in
NMSA Section 52-1-7F(2) as “a single individual who owns all the assets of a business, is solely
liable for its debts and employs in the business no person other than himself." Even though sole
pg_0002
Senate Bill 1064 – Page
2
proprietors are not, under common usage, employers and do not employ employees, the Act
appears to include them within the definition of “employer" as persons “engaged in or carrying
on for the purpose of business or trade,…", and allows them to elect not to accept the terms of
the Act. NMSA Sections 52-1-15, NMSA 52-1-7A.
It is unclear whether the amendments intend to allow sole proprietors licensed by the
Construction Industries Licensing Act, to elect not to accept the terms of the Workers
Compensation Act pursuant to NMSA 52-1-7A, or whether the amendments intend that the Act
not apply to those persons regardless of any election.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The amendment would make enforcement efforts smoother and provide more clarity for
employers who meet the criteria of CID sole proprietor. The amendment may increase claims
against the
Uninsured Employers’ Fund (“UEF"), exceeding the UEF’s ability to sustain benefit
levels to future injured workers. Monitoring the filing of affirmative elections would result in a
slight increase in WCA caseload that could easily be absorbed.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Clarifies the mandatory insurance provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act by providing
that CID sole proprietors with no employees are exempt from obtaining coverage. The
amendment will provide that these businesses do not need to obtain insurance that essentially
covers no workers. An issue could arise where subcontractors do not have coverage and, in the
event of an injury, look to the general contractor for coverage where there is none; in that event,
the Uninsured Employers’ Fund (“UEF") may be required to provide payment for the injury.
The WCA proposes that the amendment read: “unless they meet the provisions of Section 52-1-
7 NMSA 1978." This language change would include the sole proprietor definition and apply
the requirement for a sole proprietor to file an affirmative election not to accept the provisions of
the Workers’ Compensation Act. The WCA would then have a written instrument on file that
would complement its enforcement efforts. Should a sole proprietor later be found to have hired
workers, the affirmative election would also provide a basis for enforcement or fraud
proceedings.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
This bill has not been reviewed by the Workers’ Compensation Advisory Council
.
ALTERNATIVES
The Workers Compensation Administration proposes that the amendment read: “unless they
meet the provisions of Section 52-1-7 NMSA 1978."
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
Sole proprietor, one-man-shop, licensees of CID continue to incur the expense of workers’
compensation insurance even though they have no employees.
CS/mt