Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Cravens
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/19/07
HB
SHORT TITLE Voluntary Interlock Installation Tax Credit
SB 1033
ANALYST Francis
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
0.1
Recurring General Fund
* See Narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 1033 would allow a taxpayer to deduct the cost up to $1,500 of voluntarily
purchasing and installing an ignition interlock device in a vehicle registered in New Mexico. If
the installation is required by court order, the deduction is not allowed.
There is no effective date so by default the credit would apply to those installations after June
15
th
2007, the default effective date.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD:
The Department has no data that would allow it to accurately forecast the extent of
voluntary interlock installations that would result from the proposed legislation. The
General Fund impact would likely be small, however, because:
1) The deduction would be provided for voluntary interlock installation, which would
pg_0002
Senate Bill 1033 – Page
2
probably be uncommon; and 2) the proposed measure would provide a deduction of net
income against individual tax liability. Hence a taxpayer reporting net income of
$30,000 and claiming, for example, a $1,500 deduction, and subject to an individual tax
rate of 4 percent would experience a reduction in tax liability of 1,500 x .04 = $60.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Department of Public Safety:
While the hope is that use of ignition interlocks would reduce the number of DWIs’ and
DWI related accidents and deaths especially among dependent children, the initial
expense and subsequent monthly maintenance costs for an interlock run approximately
$1350 plus per year per vehicle. Fluctuations in expense depend on the age and condition
of the vehicle and how it is driven.
The average household income in Santa Fe County is $43,000 while Luna County is only
$22,888. Many mid to low income families may not be able to avail themselves of the
tax advantage.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD:
The Department’s cost of implementing the proposal’s provisions would be minor. The
department would, however, need to develop a mechanism to flag the returns that are
claiming this credit in order to verify with the courts that the devices were not installed
pursuant to a court order. Changes to various forms and instructions, as well as minor
computer program modifications would also be necessary to implement the measure.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
TRD:
If the proposed legislation were to be enacted, a taxpayer whose license is revoked under
the Implied Consent Act would probably receive a tax deduction. Someone whose license
is only revoked under the Implied Consent Act does not need a court order to obtain an
interlock license. It is up to that person to decide whether or not s/he wants to drive,
hence the person essentially voluntarily installs the device on their vehicle. Someone in
this position should probably not be able to claim the deduction. This issue may be
resolved via amending paragraph C (page 2, lines 8-9) of the proposal similar to: "The
provisions of this section do not apply to ignition interlock devices installed pursuant to a
court order or installed in order to obtain an ignition interlock license."
NF/nt