Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance

committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports

if they are used for other purposes.

Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).

Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and

attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.

F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T

SPONSOR Adair

ORIGINAL DATE

LAST UPDATED

2/19/2007

HB

SHORT TITLE Crime of Smuggling of Persons

SB 736

ANALYST Schuss

ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)

FY07

FY08

FY09 3 Year

Total Cost

Recurring

or Non-Rec

Fund

Affected

Total

Minimal Minimal Minimal Recurring General

(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)

Duplicates HB 790; Relates to SB 778

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

LFC Files

Responses Received From

Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)

Attorney General’s Office (AGO)

Public Defender Department (PDD)

New Mexico Corrections Department (CD)

Department of Public Safety (DPS)

Bernalillo County Metro Court (BCMC)

SUMMARY

Synopsis of Bill

Senate Bill 736 adds to the state’s Criminal Code, Chapter 30 (NMSA 1978), the crime of

smuggling of persons and establishes penalties including seizure and forfeiture of a motor

vehicle used in smuggling.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS

DPS reports that there would initially be a minimal impact to the Department of Public Safety

daily operations. Once officers have advanced training and become more accustomed to

identifying this crime, it could have a more substantial effect on our operation but nothing that

could not be handled with current resources.

According to CD, the addition of new felony offenses could increase the department’s costs by

Senate Bill 736 – Page

2

the minimal addition to the inmate population and probation/ parole caseloads.

SIGNIFICANT ISSUES

Section 1: Adds the new crime of smuggling of persons, when a person for pecuniary benefit

knowingly:

•

transports another person in a manner that conceals the person from law

enforcement and creates a substantial likelihood that the individual will suffer

great bodily harm or death; or

•

procures transportation for another person that is designed to conceal the

person from law enforcement and creates a substantial likelihood that the

individual will suffer great bodily harm or death.

Penalties:

•

For smuggling not resulting in injury – third degree felony

Exceptions:

1)

Smuggling of a child age 13-18 – second degree felony

2)

Smuggling of child under age 13 – first degree felony

•

For smuggling resulting in injury – second degree felony

Exception:

Smuggling a child under age 18 – first degree felony

•

For smuggling that results in great bodily harm or death – first degree felony

SB 736 requires enhanced penalty of 3 additional years for a person convicted of smuggling 10

or more persons.

Section 2: Requires motor vehicles to be subject to seizure and forfeiture when used or intended

for use in smuggling persons, and applying the State Forfeiture Act (Section 31-27-1, NMSA

1978) to seizure, forfeiture and disposal of such motor vehicle.

AGO has listed the following issues in their analysis:

According to federal law, the smuggling of persons involves the illegal transport of

persons across international borders.

The enforcement of smuggling persons is viewed as an area of federal immigration law.

The state enforcement of smuggling persons as written in SB 736 would conflict with existing

federal law.

ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS

DPS notes that often the suspects in this type of crime would not be American citizens, this

would increase the necessity of interaction with other Nation’s Consulates by the Department of

Public Safety or other investigating agencies.

PERFORMACE IMPLCATIONS

AGO notes that state law enforcement will require extensive training with federal government

and additional resources.

Senate Bill 736 – Page

3

DUPLICATION, RELATIONSHIP

Duplicates HB 790; Relates to SB 778

WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL

DPS states that the smuggling industry will continue to operate without fear of prosecution at the

state level. State and local enforcement will continue to rely on federal agencies for prosecution.

BS/mt