Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Altamirano
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/15/07
HB
SHORT TITLE Medicaid Reimbursements to Certain Entities
SB 644
ANALYST Weber
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
$2,412.4
Recurring
General
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
$5,981.5
Recurring
Federal
Medicaid Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Human Services Department
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 644 appropriates $2.412.4 million from the general fund to the Human Services
Department for the purpose adjusting certain Medicaid reimbursement rates.
On July 1, 2007 HSD shall adjust by 4 percent for inflation and cost indexing the Medicaid rates
paid to nursing facilities as specified by regulation.
On September 1, 2007 HSD shall adjust by 4 percent for inflation and Medicaid rates paid to
pg_0002
Senate Bill 644 – Page
2
intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded.
The bill contains an emergency clause.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $2.412 million contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general
fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of Fiscal Year 2008 shall
not revert to the general fund.
On July 1, 2007, $2.104.0 million is appropriated to include an inflation adjustment of four
percent as part of re-basing the Medicaid reimbursement rates, to licensed nursing facilities.
On September 1, 2007, $308.0 thousand is appropriated to include an inflation adjustment of
four percent, to licensed intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
HSD reports that July 1, 2007 is a rebasing year for nursing facilities, it is not however a
rebasing year for intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded (ICF/MR). The estimated
increase for the nursing facility rebasing without the Market Basket Index (MBI) is 11.9%. With
an additional 4% added to this, the nursing facility rates would be increased by approximately
15.9% which means a state general fund cost of approximately $8.9 million. If the ICF/MRs are
given a 4% increase on July 1, 2007, this would mean an additional increase to the state general
fund of approximately $246,842.00. For FY09, with an estimated MBI of 3.1%, this would
mean an additional increase to the state general fund of $2.1 million. With the rebasing for
ICF/MRs and the MBI, this is an estimated increase of 13.1% which means an additional impact
to the state general fund of $840,745.00. Therefore, the appropriation of $2.4 million for FY08
would result in an additional estimated operating budget impact of approximately $12 million
GF in FY09. Subsequent years will continue to grow as rebasing is based on increasing costs as
well as the MBI increase which is normally not known until the beginning of the federal fiscal
year.
The projected FY08 expenditure level for nursing facilities is $180 million and $21 million for
ICF/MR facilities. A mandated 4 percent annual increase totals approximately $8 million
requiring a general fund appropriation of close to the appropriation included in the bill. However
as HSD notes, this amount will be included in the three-year rebasing process causing a
“compounding effect" that totals about $12 million as reported by HSD.
While annual increases should be expected in all areas of the Medicaid program mandating an
inflation factor takes away the power of the legislature to make appropriations consistent with
each year’s circumstances.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Why would only these particular Medicaid services be protected by mandated annual cost
increases and not all services.
MW/mt