Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Rodriguez
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/01/07
HB
SHORT TITLE
Santa Fe Women’s Health Services Facility
SB 527
ANALYST Hanika Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
$500.0
recurring
general fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Local Government Division/Department of Finance Administration (LGD/DFA)
Department of Health (DOH)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 527 appropriates $500 thousand from the general fund to the department of finance
and administration to provide for services at the Women’s Health Services (WHS) facility in
Santa Fe.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $500 thousand contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general
fund.
WHS receives a recurring yearly appropriation from DOH. WHS is receiving $300 thousand
through the competitive Rural Primary Health Care Act (RPHCA) RFP process for FY07. The
funds appropriated in this bill will be in addition to those funds. Women’s Health Services
received a separate one-time non-competitive special appropriation of $192 thousand from DOH
in FY07. Other non-competitive special appropriations have occurred in the past to WHS.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 527 – Page
2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
WHS is a 501(c) (3) community service agency that has been providing health services to
residents in Santa Fe County since 1973. WHS provides outreach/public health education,
professional education, direct healthcare services and participates in medical research for
women's health initiatives. WHS sees sliding scale fee patients and low-income patients and gets
no federal money for direct patient services. This appropriation will cover additional operating
expenses of WHS.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
LGD/DFA reports the Division cannot write a sole-source justification for general primary
healthcare services to a non-profit provider without violating the procurement code. Nor could
the Division sponsor a competitive procurement because the appropriation names a beneficiary
and the funds would not be available for any other agency than that named in the appropriation.
ALTERNATIVES
LGD/DFA reports this appropriation raises severe anti-donation issues. DOH must follow a
competitive review process pursuant to the Rural Primary Health Care Act in selecting providers.
At face value this appropriation would bypass that process. If DOH attempts to write a sole-
source justification, the contract would be subject to protest by other providers. LGF/DFA
recommends directing the appropriation to DOH as an addition to the regular primary care
contract funds. Then WHS could compete with other providers in an attempt to increase their
base funding.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
Why was WHS able to divert the RFP process to receive one time appropriations in the past.
AHO/mt