Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Robinson
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/8/07
HB
SHORT TITLE Remove Statutory Rule Against Perpetuities
SB 522
ANALYST Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 522 would enact a new section providing that “The common law rule against
perpetuities as it applies to New Mexico is abrogated." The bill would also repeal the statutory
“rule against perpetuities" set forth in New Mexico’s Uniform Probate Code in NMSA Sections
45-2-901- to 45-2-906.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The effect of this bill would be to abolish any rule of perpetuities in New Mexico, thereby
allowing testators to earmark property for ownership, use or enjoyment by persons in the infinite
future for generations to come.
According to the AGO, the “rule against perpetuities" is a rule in property law that prohibits a
grant of property from “vesting" (entitling the beneficiary to present or future ownership, use or
enjoyment of property) beyond a certain period of time. It is intended to prevent people from
tying up assets for too long a period of time and is concerned with the “utility" of property. The
purpose of the rule is to limit a testator’s power to earmark property gifts for remote descendants.
Attempts to do so beyond the so-called “common law" period or beyond superceding statutory
periods are void. Examples of such attempts usually involve contingencies requiring a