Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Asbill
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/08/2007
3/13/2007 HB
SHORT TITLE State Payment for Mandatory Assessments
SB 501/aSEC/aHEC
ANALYST Aguilar
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
$0.1
Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to appropriations contained in the General Appropriations Act
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Public Education Department (PED)
Office of Educational Accountability (OEA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HEC Amendment
The House Education Committee amendment to Senate Bill 501 as amended makes technical
changes to language referring to tests and assessments. The amendment also changes the grades
to be assessed annually from grades three to nine to grades three to eight. This aligns the bill
with state and No Child Left Behind Act assessment requirements.
The amendment adds language that prior to establishing a preliminary unit value the department
shall determine the amount of money required to pay for the cost of district and school level
academic assessments and transfer the amount to the department’s operating budget.
The amendment contains a delayed repeal of July 1, 2010.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Moving funds for paying the district and school level costs of testing to the department will
reduce the unit value accordingly.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 501/aSEC/aHEC – Page
2
The SEG contains approximately $7.4 million for assessment costs, while the 2006 cost of
assessments was approximately $6.6 million.
Synopsis of SEC Amendment
The Senate Education Committee Amendment to Senate Bill 502 removes students from the
measure of adequately yearly progress and makes technical changes to language.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 501 provides that the department will pay the costs of required academic
assessments, including development, administration and technical support.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act measures adequate yearly progress for schools
and school districts, not individual students. Striking the reference to “student" aligns the
language in the bill with NCLB.
Technical changes to language updates and clarifies references to annual student assessments.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
Item 2 of the amendment refers to Page 2, lines 2 and 3, strikes and replaces language. To take
the required action the reference should be to lines 1 and 2.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
From FY’00 through FY’07, the Legislature appropriated $24.6 million for mandatory student
assessment. Of that total, $17.2 million was appropriated for nonrecurring test development
costs, and $7.4 million was appropriated for the recurring costs of test printing, shipping,
scoring, and results reporting.
The state already pays for the cost of assessments as the distribution to schools through the
funding formula contains $7.4 million annually for these costs.
Both PED and OEA note the need for additional appropriations to cover the costs of the
provisions contained in SB-501, however these costs could be covered by removing the $7.4
million from the SEG distribution and including it in the PED base budget or creating a fund to
draw from for these costs. It is important to note the amount necessary to pay for these costs
may vary year-to-year as enrollment fluctuates or the cost of assessment instruments rises.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
PED notes that currently the costs of statewide student education assessments are shared by PED
and the public school districts. This arrangement was implemented many years ago, placing
responsibility on districts for ordering testing materials. Perhaps it was then believed that
districts could more accurately estimate the number of test booklets needed than could PED.
Though districts pay for testing materials, PED provides sufficient funding through the formula
pg_0003
Senate Bill 501/aSEC/aHEC – Page
3
to cover their costs.
PED pays the cost of ongoing test development. The 89 districts pay the costs of printing and
shipping tests, scoring and printing reports on school and district results.
The cost-sharing arrangement has not resulted in accurate test booklet orders. Districts tend to
order more tests than they need, presumably to prepare for unexpected circumstances. Though
districts are refunded for returning unused tests, the vendor absorbs the cost and the tests are
destroyed. Ultimately the state pays for unused tests.
A number of districts have requested that PED pay all costs for the assessments to reduce the
administrative burden required to budget and manage assessment funds.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
PED will incur some additional costs as a result of this bill, however the agency should be able
to cover these costs within existing appropriations.
PA/nt:csd