Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Beffort
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/13/07
03/15/07 HB
SHORT TITLE
Juvenile Justice Facility Background Checks
SB 471/aHCPAC
ANALYST Hanika Ortiz/Baca
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total $1.4
$1.8
$2.0
$5.2 Recurring General
fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Children, Youth & Families Department (CYFD)
Department of Public Safety (DPS)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HCPAC Amendment
Senate Consumer and Public Affairs Committee amendments stipulate that fingerprint and
background checks will be required of anyone in a facility who has direct unsupervised contact
with residents and that a volunteer will be responsible for the cost of the background {check).
In the amendment, the word “check" is not included after “background," the last term in the
amendment. Presumably, the intent is that the volunteer will pay for the cost of a background
check.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 471 amends Sections 9-2A-1 and 9-2A-8.1 NMSA 1978 and adds language that
requires DPS to conduct background investigations including fingerprints for volunteers in
juvenile justice facilities. The volunteer background investigations will be treated identically to
employee or prospective employee background investigations. The bill also sets criteria for
when the fingerprinting will be appropriate such as unsupervised contact with residents and
identifying certain roles.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 471/aHCPAC – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Estimated cost per check on each volunteer is $34.00 per background check. Based on an
average of 200 hundred volunteers across all facilities, the estimated total cost would be $7.0.
As of this date, 19 background investigations that included fingerprinting have been conducted
for volunteers in juvenile justice facilities. If the number of volunteers at juvenile justice
facilities remains constant, CYFD will conduct approximately 40 background investigations
including fingerprinting this fiscal year. A conservative 10 % increase per year may result in 44
volunteer checks in FY08, 49 volunteer checks in FY09.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The DPS serves as the State Central Repository for Criminal History and as the liaison to the FBI
for the purpose of conducting Nationwide Background Checks. The FBI’s authority to conduct
the background is pursuant to PL 92-544, which requires that a state have an authorized state
statute in place before they can conduct the background check.
The bill could positively impact CYFD by statutorily codifying our current practice of
conducting background investigations on volunteers including fingerprints to DPS and the FBI;
not just allowing but requiring it, supporting our efforts to create a safer environment for our
kids.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
Depending on the anticipated volumes, the DPS Law Enforcement Records Bureau workload
may be impacted.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The bill could impact the process utilized to develop and enforce agreements with volunteer
groups or agencies. Any agreements or contracts should require volunteer groups and agencies,
as well as contract agencies to obtain appropriate background checks. They should also contain
a mechanism to account for new staff or volunteers that ensure their background check status is
reported to JJS whenever new staff or volunteers serve JJS facility clients in an unsupervised
setting.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
If this Bill is not passed, persons may be approved to work in sensitive areas that would not have
otherwise been approved.
AHO/nt