Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Harden
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/25/07
2/20/07 HB
SHORT TITLE
Extending the Period of Time
for Certain Entities to make Deposits
SB 429/aSPAC
ANALYST Propst
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates House Bill 194
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of SPAC Amendment
The Senate Public Affairs Committee amendment to the original bill retains the five working day
requirement for deposits, except in cases where inclement weather or natural disaster conditions
exist. In cases where inclement weather or natural disaster conditions exist, a municipality
would have up to 10 days to make the deposit.
Synopsis of Original Bill
Senate Bill 429 increases the time within which certain municipalities may deposit receipt of
public money. Municipalities or villages not having suitable banking facilities within their
boundaries in which to deposit collected receipts of public money currently must deposit those
funds within a period not to exceed 5 working days. The bill extends the period to 10 working
days from the date of receipt.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 429/aSPAC – Page
2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Remote municipalities and villages without suitable banking facilities generally do not gather
large deposits during a five day work week. The extended time to make the small deposits would
reduce the expense of time and money currently expensed to make deposits within the current 5
day work week.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Duplicates House Bill 194.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
In its analysis, DFA notes that, when a municipality or village does collect a large public deposit,
which is to be defined by rule, it should be made in a timely manner not to exceed 5 working
days.
Additionally, were accessibility to electronic communications technology exists in remote
municipalities and villages, public entities should make every effort to use this form of
communication to make timely deposits with a financial institution within its boundaries that
have the technology to accept electronic deposits. In this case the 5 day work week should also
apply.
Finally, a municipality or village should obtain safekeeping furniture, fixtures and equipment to
secure the cash if given the additional time to make deposits.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The current five day rule for deposits would remain in effect.
WEP/csd