Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Martinez
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/07/07
02/09/07 HB
SHORT TITLE Exclusion from Gross Receipts Definition
SB 321
ANALYST Schardin
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
($960.0)
Recurring General Fund
($640.0)
Recurring Local
Governments
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Response Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 321 creates a new gross receipts tax exclusion for receipts of temporary staffing firms
paid by customers for employee-related costs of services performed by employees of the
temporary staffing firm including wages, salaries, bonuses, commissions, employee benefits,
expense reimbursements, insurance, and employment taxes.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS.
TRD estimates that GRT paid by temporary staffing companies is about $1.6 million per year,
most of which will be excluded from GRT due to this bill. About 60 percent of this revenue loss
will accrue to the general fund and the remaining 40 percent will accrue to local governments.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Under current law, temporary employment agency services pay gross receipts tax on the wages
earned by their employees. However, employee-leasing agencies, which are operationally the
same as temporary employment agencies, only pay gross receipts tax on the commissions they
pg_0002
Senate Bill 321 – Page
2
earn, not on the wages earned by leased employees. This bill would level the playing field
between these two similar types of businesses by taxing them equally.
LFC notes that while individual deductions from the gross receipts tax may have small fiscal
impacts, their cumulative effect significantly narrows the gross receipts tax base. Narrowing the
gross receipts tax base increases revenue volatility and requires a higher tax rate to generate the
same amount of revenue.
The bill will reduce local government gross receipts tax collections. Many of New Mexico’s
local governments are highly dependent on gross receipts tax revenue.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
The bill will have a minimal administrative impact on TRD.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
It should be noted that many temporary staffing agencies are nationwide companies located
elsewhere doing business selling professional services in New Mexico.
ALTERNATIVES
In 2003, the final report of the Blue Ribbon Tax Reform Commission’s included a proposal to
make wages of employee leasing agencies taxable. This proposal also levels the playing field
between two the two types of temporary employment agencies addressed in this bill but does so
by making them both taxable instead of making them both exempt from taxation. This alternative
proposal was expected to increase gross receipts tax collections by about $9 million. About 60
percent of that increase would benefit the general fund and the remaining 40 percent benefit local
governments.
SS/nt