Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Griego
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/24/07
HB
SHORT TITLE Penalties for Used Oil Violations
SB 266
ANALYST Wilson
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Corrections Department (CD)
Environment Department (ED)
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
Senate Bill 266 amends Section 74-4-11 NMSA of the Hazardous Waste Act. This bill adds a
new paragraph making it unlawful for any person to knowingly store, treat, dispose of transport,
cause to be transported, market or otherwise handle any used oil in knowing violation of any
material condition or requirement of any applicable rule adopted and promulgated pursuant to
the Hazardous Waste Act. Any person convicted of violating this provision is guilty of a fourth
degree felony punishable by incarceration of up to eighteen month and/or a fine of up to $10,000
per violation per day.
Senate Bill 266 also amends section D of 74-4-11 NMSA by changing the word “he" to “person"
which makes the application of this part gender neutral.
pg_0002
Senate Bill 266 – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
ED does not anticipate that Senate Bill 266 will create a significant burden on existing resources.
No financial impact is anticipated.
CD could see increased costs as a result of any new crime, but the number of convictions as
result of this bill is likely to be minimal
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Entities that now manage used oil are subject to regulation and enforcement by the federal
government through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the state through ED.
Although this facet of environmental regulation can be delegated from EPA to the state, EPA
changed that delegation because New Mexico has no criminal penalty provision in statute for
used oil violations. Senate Bill 266 will satisfy this federal requirement and allow delegation of
the program to New Mexico.
New Mexico examples of entities subject to the used oil regulations are:
Generators (e.g., auto service businesses)
Collection centers (e.g., Jiffy Lube, solid waste transfer stations)
Transporters and transfer facilities (e.g., Safety-Kleen, Honstein Oil, Thermofluids)
Processors and re-refiners (e.g., Mesa Oil)
Off-spec oil burners (e.g., asphalt plants, industrial oil-fired space heaters)
Marketers (e.g., Mesa Oil, Thermofluids)
Senate Bill 266 will not apply to a “do-it-yourself" oil change; only to mainly commercial
interests that manage large quantities of used oil on a regular basis. Existing New Mexico
regulations relax the regulatory burden on these facilities. In contrast, EPA requires a more
stringent regulatory framework that assumes the used oil is hazardous waste. EPA recognized
this over 10 years ago and expects states to obtain program authorization so that these entities
can be regulated by one authority with a “common-sense" approach. The passage of Senate Bill
266 will make this happen.
Criminal penalties will only apply to knowing violations and even then primarily those resulting
in substantial danger of a significantly adverse environmental impact. They will not apply to
inadvertent spills that are promptly cleaned up. Any enforcement will be done by the AGO.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
ED states there are no significant implications. Seeking criminal penalties authorized by Senate
Bill 266 will require ED to coordinate with the AGO. This is no different than the process ED
currently follows for the existing criminal penalties under the Act.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The AGO states the bill as drafted implies that “used oil" does not fall within the current
definition of “hazardous waste" and thus there is a need to enact a separate and distinct violation.
Further, Senate Bill 266 does not include a definition of “used oil". It is unclear as to whether
“used oil" only refers to used motor oil or whether “used oil" refers to other oils or oil by-
products produced in other industries.
DW/csd