Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Steinborn
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/26/07
HB HJR 16
SHORT TITLE Veteran Organization Property Taxes CA
SB
ANALYST Francis
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
Indeterminate
Recurring
Local
Governments
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Relates to HB719
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) (response to HB719)
Department of Veterans Services (DVS)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Joint Resolution 16 proposes a constitutional amendment to exempt veterans’
organization property from property tax liability. The organization must be chartered by the US
Congress and the property is that property used for events or by nonprofit community
organizations or other veterans’ organizations.
FISCAL IMPACT
Assuming each property is valued at $250,000, the 175 veteran’s organizations reported by the
Department of Veterans Services that would qualify would own $44 million in property. The
taxable value is $14.6 million and the liability would be approximately $400 thousand statewide.
If more of the organizations are in Bernalillo County, the impact could be much higher as
Bernalillo County has a higher property tax rate.
pg_0002
House Joint Resolution 16 – Page
2
Since most counties adjust the property tax rate according to their funding needs, any property
tax exemption for one group of taxpayers has the effect of raising property tax rates for all other
taxpayers.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Department of Veterans Service:
Veteran Service Organizations exist to serve the local veteran community. These local
posts are many times the only place that veterans can go to for information on local, state,
and federal veterans’ benefits. With the increase of young men and women returning
from Operation Iraqi Freedom, the mission of these local posts are changing from a place
to congregate and have a drink with fellow veterans, to an local outreach center for these
veterans.
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) – in response to HB 719:
Current assessments for these organizations would be excluded from the tax roles and
property tax collection and distribution would be diminished. Fiscal impact would likely
be spread throughout the state. NM counties, cities and schools will take the big hits on
operating revenues. With voter-approved bond issues, the total debt service is divided by
the current taxable value to get a debt rate. Thus, the effect of this bill on capital would be
to shift burden from the veteran’s organizations to the general public. The county that
would probably take the hardest hit would be Bernalillo County, due to the fact that the
county has the largest number of veterans’ organizations headquarters.
This legislation exempts from property taxation the VFW, DAV, American Legion and
AMVETS along with many smaller organizations chartered by the US Congress. In NM
there are between 500 and 600 active chartered veterans’ organizations. Out of the ap-
proximately 600 organizations, probably the majority rent out space to governments for
events or to other community organizations. Since the bill does not quantity how much
community or government use is necessary to qualify for the exemption, we must as-
sume that every active chartered veteran’s organization that owns property will qualify
for this exemption.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
DFA has questioned whether the exemption should apply to all veterans’ organizations rather
than just those chartered by Congress.
DFA reports that NM already is a low property tax state in comparison with other states and so
the state needs to be careful in allowing exemptions from property tax.
NF/nt