Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Arnold-Jones
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
3/1/07
HB 1229
SHORT TITLE Parental Consent for Mental Health Treatment
SB
ANALYST Hanika Ortiz
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
see narrative
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Office of the Attorney General (AGO)
Developmental Disabilities Planning Council (DDPC)
Children, Youth & Family Department (CYFD)
Human Services Department (HSD)
Health Policy Commission (HPC)
Department of Health (DOH)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 1229 amends Section 32A-6-11.1 NMSA 1978 of the Children’s Mental Health and
Developmental Disabilities Act (Act) to change the age of consent for residential treatment for
mental health disorders, or habilitation treatment for developmental disabilities, from fourteen to
eighteen. It will effectively require parental consent for that treatment for people under the age of
eighteen.
The bill also amends NMSA Section 32A-6-14 of the Act to eliminate the right of a child less
than eighteen years old to receive individual psychotherapy, group psychotherapy, guidance,
counseling, or other forms of verbal therapy without parental consent. It would also amend that
section to eliminate the right of a child aged fourteen or older to receive psychotropic
medications or interventions involving aversive stimuli or substantial deprivation without
parental consent.
The bill repeals NMSA Section 32A-6-12 of the Act which provides for voluntary residential
pg_0002
House Bill 1229 – Page
2
treatment for mental disorders or habilitation for developmental disabilities for children aged
fourteen or older.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The HPC reports that 44,406 New Mexican children under the age of 18 suffer a diagnosable
mental disorder that seriously interferes with the child’s role or functioning in family, school or
community activities. Only one-fourth of children aged 9-17 with mental health disorders receive
services for mental, behavior or substance use problems.
HB 1229 is not part of the Governor’s Executive Budget request for FY08. HSD reports that two
of the Governor’s primary performance outcomes in behavioral health are to reduce youth
suicide; and, to increase access to services. HSD states the provisions of this bill will make it
more difficult and less likely, for youth to access services, particularly in school-based health
centers where it’s readily available. The fiscal and administrative impact to State agencies from
poor school performance, drug abuse and other behavioral problems resulting from the
restrictions within the bill could be significant.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
This bill seeks to repeal the right of older children to participate in their mental health treatment
decisions, requiring that only parents make mental health treatment decisions for youth between
the ages of fourteen and eighteen. The bill makes an assumption that parents possess what a child
lacks in capacity for making sound judgments concerning their need for care or treatment.
The Departments report that in June of 2006 a task force was convened who worked through
October of 2006 to review and update this section of the Children’s Code. The Task Force had
35 appointed members, including representatives from CYFD, HSD, DOH, children’s mental
health service providers, parents, advocates and other interested people. In addition, the Task
Force received public input through written comments. The Task Force was fully aware of the
high rates of mental illness, substance abuse and suicide in New Mexico’s children. As a result,
the Task Force carefully weighed the need for older adolescents to have access to mental health
care and the need to participate in their own treatment decisions with the need to support families
in the treatment process. HB 637 reflects the thoughtful deliberation of the Task Force regarding
consent issues. CYFD has adopted the Task Force recommendations in HB 637 which is
consistent with national best practice standards.
CYFD comments that if this bill is enacted and the current rights to self-determination regarding
mental health treatment and placement decisions of 14 – 17 year olds are abrogated, New
Mexico will be in opposition to the national trend. Children and adolescents age 14 to 17
nationwide, particularly those housed within the protective and juvenile justice systems, have
been granted the right to make informed decisions regarding their own mental health and
substance abuse treatment residential treatment placements.
pg_0003
House Bill 1229 – Page
3
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
DDPC notes that the Children’s Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code, enacted in
1995, recognized the need for older children to participate in their mental health treatment
decisions.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
If enacted, this Bill will require significant changes in State departments policies and procedures
with regard to mental health admission, discharge, programmatic and medication consents for
youth age 14 to 17 years of age.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
Conflicts with HB637/a, Children’s Mental Recodification, which attempts to strike a balance
between a youth’s right to access services; and, parental involvement in treatment planning.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
DOH notes the bill approaches developmental disabilities and mental health treatment as though
they were similar enough to be interchangeable and does not recognize the distinct differences
between the two populations. Educational and treatment approaches for children with
developmental disabilities differ greatly from that of children who have mental health issues.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
CYFD notes if this bill were passed it would potentially make in much more difficult – and less
likely - for youth to access services, particularly in the schools, and will consequently make it
more difficult to intervene with children who were contemplating suicide.
CYFD further notes the quality of the therapeutic relationship, including cooperation and “buy-
in" with treatment, is associated with better clinical outcomes. These factors can be negated
when a person capable of making an informed choice instead feels compelled to participate in
treatment.
AMENDMENTS
Retain the language “the child shall be released or" on line 17 of page 8.
AHO/nt