Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Vigil
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/27/07
HB 1158
SHORT TITLE Increase Liquor Excise Tax
SB
ANALYST Francis
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
$69,216.0
$70,600.0 Recurring General Fund
$2,633.0
$2,686.0 Recurring
Local
Governments
$34,483.0
$35,173.0 Recurring DWI Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 1158 increases the excise taxes on different types of alcoholic beverages:
Current Law HB1158 Difference ($) Difference (%)
Spiritous liquors
1.60
$
4.98
$
3.38
$
211%
Beer (except micro)
0.41
1.85
1.44
$
351%
Wine (except small grower)
0.45
1.46
1.01
$
224%
Fortified wine
1.50
2.77
1.27
$
85%
Beer (Micro)
0.08
0.08
-
$
0%
Wine (Small grower) < 80,000 liters
0.10
0.10
-
$
0%
Wine (Small grower) 80,000 - 560,000 liters
0.20
0.20
-
$
0%
Cider
0.41
0.41
-
$
0%
pg_0002
House Bill 1158 – Page
2
The effective date is July 1, 2007.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The impact of more than doubling of the excise taxes is enormous at over $100 million. There
are three impacts that combine to form the total: increase in the excise tax, increase in gross
receipts collected, and a decrease in the consumption of alcohol, either through substitution of
the beverages that did not have the tax hiked, less consumption, or increased purchases of non-
taxed beverages.
TRD:
The liquor excise is paid by the distributor and is passed through to the consumer in the
retail price. Liquor sales are also subject to gross receipts taxes, the state wide average
GRT rate is 6.6%. The total GRT increase is approximately $6.8 million, 60% will be
deposited to the General Fund and the remaining 40% distributed to local governments.
The price increase will have an elasticity effect and decrease quantity sold. The table
below demonstrates the elasticity effect of the tax increase by liquor base on volume
estimates for fiscal year 2008.
Spirits Fortified Wine Beer
Current $1.60
$1.50
$0.41
Proposed $4.98
$2.77
$1.85
Tax increase $3.38
$1.27
$1.44
Retail Price $27.00
$8.00
$6.50
Price Increase 12.52%
15.88%
22.15%
Elasticity (0.39)
(0.58)
(0.16)
Volumes Decrease -4.88%
-9.21%
-3.54%
Source: TRD
The table below calculates that increase in liquor excise tax collections a based on
volume for fiscal year 2008. The quantity decrease has been calculated and the proposed
tax rates applied to the net volumes. Spirits and fortified wine volumes are in liters, beer
is gallons.
In Thousands Spirits Fortified Wine
Beer
Total
Volumes 9,859
100
50,000
Elasticity Effect (481)
(9)
(1,772)
Net Volumes 9,378
91
48,228
Current Revenue $15,774
$150
$20,500
$36,424
Proposed Revenue $46,701
$251
$89,221
$136,173
Net Increase $30,926
$101
$68,721
$99,749
Source: TRD
pg_0003
House Bill 1158 – Page
3
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
As TRD has reported, this would reduce the consumption of these items. Whether it results in
less consumption of alcoholic beverages is uncertain. While most alcoholic beverages have few
substitutes, wine can be ordered from other states over the internet and so this increase may drive
up online purchases which generally do not result in tax revenues (these purchases are not
necessarily tax-free but the collection is difficult to impossible).
NF/nt