Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lundstrom
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/19/07
3/01/07 HB 1027/aHCPAC
SHORT TITLE Public Record Inspection Exemption
SB
ANALYST Ortiz
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Relates to HB 950
Relates to SB 829
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Commission of Public Records (CPR)
Attorney General’s Office (AGO)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HCPAC Amendment
House Consumer and Public Affairs Committee amendment specified that those who reside in a
domestic violence shelter, whose residence has been secured by a domestic violence shelter
program, who are protected under an order of protection issued pursuant to Chapter 40, Article
13 NMSA 1978 or other such court-ordered protection and shall be exempt from public records
inspection.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 1027 amends the public records inspection act by adding a new and very narrow
exception. The new exception would exempt the home addresses of municipal or county utilities’
customers from inspection under the inspection of public records act.
pg_0002
House Bill 1027/aHCPAC – Page
2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Although the Commission of Public Records indicates it is unaware of the genesis of the bill, the
assumption is that it is an effort to hamper identity theft and/or prevent the use of the information
for solicitation.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
There would appear to be no fiscal impact on the Commission of Public Records; the
Commission would not normally hold custody to local utility records. Commission of Public
Records adds that local government records retention and disposition schedules issued by the
Commission are advisory and must be adopted by the local governing body to be binding.
However, as a point of information, the utility records in those schedules generally have short-
term retentions. Municipal utility registers, which may contain customer names and addresses,
under the municipal records retention and disposition schedule, have a three-year after close of
the fiscal year retention on the end-of-the year register and until the audit report is released on
the monthly register. County utility records, which could include the name and address of the
customer, have either five-year retentions (on work orders) or, in the case of customer utility
listings, until superseded.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 1027 could possibly relate to HB950 and SB829. Those bills amend the Public
Records Act (rather than the Inspection of Public Records Act), changing provisions relating to
public access of information held in databases.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
It should be noted, offers the AGO, that the home addresses of public employees are currently
considered public information under the IPRA if related to public business; this is an issue that
has raised some privacy and identity theft concerns.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
What goal is this bill trying to achieve.
EO/csd