00Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR King
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/06/07
2/14/07 HB 875
SHORT TITLE Torrance County Emergency Loan Retirement
SB
ANALYST Propst
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
$381.0
Non-recurring
General Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
HB 875 appropriates $381.0 from the General Fund to the Local Government Division of the
Department of Finance and Administration to retire the emergency loans made by the State
Board of Finance to Torrance County.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The appropriation of $318.0 contained in this bill is a non-recurring expense to the General
Fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY08 shall revert to
the General Fund.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Historically, smaller counties have experienced difficulty in meeting the high cost of
incarcerating prisoners. Torrance County is no exception. In order to continue jail operations the
County was forced in 2004 and 2006 to obtain emergency loans totaling $381.0 from the State
Board of Finance. In January, 2005 the County imposed both increments of the Corrections
Gross Receipts Tax, however, the County continues to struggle to meet incarceration costs.
pg_0002
House Bill 875 – Page
2
Torrance County’s repayment plan calls for the first installment in the amount of $82,750 due
July, 2007. DFA reports that, although Torrance County is keeping up with their current
incarceration costs, it is more than likely that the County will not be able to meet their first Board
of Finance loan installment.
ALTERNATIVES
In addition to Torrance County, other smaller counties have also borrowed money from the State
Board of Finance to pay for escalating incarceration costs. The counties are forced to do this in
order to continue operating and meeting required services to county citizens. In all likelihood,
these counties do not have the recurring funding sources to meet these recurring costs. A more
appropriate remedy may be to appropriate recurring funding to smaller counties, such as
proposed in SB 410 or HB 316
WEP/nt