Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR
King
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/2/07
3/2/07
HB
651/aHFL
SHORT TITLE
Interior Design Licensure and Board
SB
ANALYST
C.Sanchez
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
Duplicates SB 535
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Regulation and Licensing Department (RLD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HFl Amendment
The House Floor amendment adds that all board members shall be residents of New Mexico and
no more than two members shall be appointed from the same congressional district.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 651 proposes to amend the current governing Interior Designers Act, Chapter 61;
Article 24C NMSA 1978. This legislation proposes three main changes to the Interior Designers
Act. The first change is to amend the board composition from three public members and two
professional members to two public members and three professional members. Second, is to
eliminate the current license renewal date of December 1 and add replacement language that
requires annual renewal. Third, to avoid First Amendment challenges to the Act. Accordingly, it
is necessary to add the word “licensed" in front of the designation interior designer, to redefine
this term.
pg_0002
House Bill 651/aHFL – Page
2
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The Interior Design board is a self-funded board which is financed through license fees. There is
no fiscal impact attached to these proposed changes.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Constitutional Challenge
: This bill was promulgated primarily as the result of an agreement
with a group who challenged the current Interior Design Act on First Amendment grounds. To
avoid litigation on the constitutionality of the Interior Design Act, the term Interior Designer
needs to be defined as a “licensed interior designer."
Board Members:
The board advocates that membership of the board should include a majority
of licensed designers rather than public members. This would ensure a greater understanding
and representation of the profession as it relates to national standards and licensee
responsibilities.
License renewal date
: The removal of “succeeding December 31" will allow the board the
flexibility to change the renewal date through regulations rather than by statute.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
SB 535
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The Interior Design Act is open for constitutional challenge and could ultimately be determined
unconstitutional and therefore invalid.
The Interior Design board will maintain current license renewal date in statute, and the board
membership would remain with three public members and two professional interior designer
members.
CS/nt