Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Silva
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
2/1/07
HB 396
SHORT TITLE Business-Related Service Gross Receipts
SB
ANALYST Schardin
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
($3,815.1)
($4,005.9) Recurring General Fund
($7.7)
($8.1) Recurring Small Cities
Assistance Fund
($7.7)
($8.1) Recurring Small Counties
Assistance Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
200.0
200.0 Nonrecurring General
Fund
200.0
200.0
400.0 Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 396 creates the business services tax credit. The credit may be claimed against the
state gross receipts tax or compensating tax. A credit that exceeds a taxpayer’s tax liability may
be carried forward for up to three years.
The credit on “qualified expenditures" will be equal to 3.775 percent of gross receipts in
pg_0002
House Bill 396 – Page
2
municipalities and 5 percent in unincorporated areas of New Mexico counties. In other words,
“qualified expenditures" will receive a 100 percent credit against the state share of gross receipts
tax. However, local option taxes of about 1 percent will still be charged on qualified
expenditures.
“Qualified expenditures" are defined as the amount paid by the taxpayer for business services
eligible for a federal income tax deduction pursuant to Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code,
which pertains to trade or business expenses (see Significant Issues for a description of what
expenditures are deductible under Section 162). However, qualified expenditures do not include
services for linen supply, entertainment or recreation, intrastate telephone and telegraph,
janitorial, landscaping, repair and maintenance, construction, research and development, sewer
and solid waste disposal, or services of which price is the basis for any other New Mexico tax
credit.
Taxpayers eligible for the business services tax credit include anyone liable for payment of any
tax or anyone who owes a tax. The business will also be required to have total receipts of less
than $300 thousand per year to qualify for the credit. Governmental entities, nonprofit facilities
and other entities that are exempt from the gross receipts tax such as retirement homes and
insurance companies are not eligible to receive the credit.
The bill states that the gross receipts of a group of entities under common control will be
aggregated to determine the size of the credit.
The effective date of these provisions is July 1, 2007 (see technical issues).
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
Based on analysis of “Report 80-Analysis of Gross Receipts Tax by Industrial Classification"
and Implan input-output data of the New Mexico economy, TRD estimates that business to
business services for companies with total receipts under $300 thousand per year that are eligible
for the new credit created in this bill will total $112 million in FY08. Assuming a statewide
average tax rate of 3.8 percent and 90% utilization of the credit, expenditures qualifying for these
credits will total $3,830.4 thousand per year.
TRD estimates that 98 percent of the credits, about $3,724.0 thousand, will be claimed against
the state portion of gross receipts tax. The remaining 2 percent of the credits, or $76 thousand in
FY08, will be claimed against the compensating tax. Eighty percent of the compensating tax loss
($60.8 thousand) will accrue to the general fund, while the remaining 20 percent loss will accrue
evenly to the small cities and small counties assistance funds ($7.7 thousand each). Fiscal
impacts of the provision are expected to grow by 5 percent each year.
Because the credit applies only to the state share of gross receipts tax liability, the bill does not
impact local government gross receipts tax revenues.
pg_0003
House Bill 396 – Page
3
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The bill attempts to reduce the tax burden on businesses caused by pyramiding, which results
when transactional taxes such as New Mexico’s gross receipts and compensating taxes are
charged on the sale of business services from one business to another. As services are sold from
one business to another in the course of production, the tax is levied multiple times and results in
higher business costs and final product prices.
Pyramiding is a somewhat unique tax dilemma in New Mexico because the gross receipts tax is a
fundamentally different structure than the sales tax imposed by most other states. While sales
taxes are imposed on the buyer
of consumer goods, the gross receipts tax is imposed on the seller
of goods and services
, whether that product is a finished good or an input used by another
business.
Pyramiding affects some facets of New Mexico’s business community more than others. First,
businesses that compete with other businesses outside of New Mexico may experience a
competitive disadvantage because their competitors don’t pay multiple taxes on their inputs and
therefore have lower costs of production.
Second, small businesses that contract with other businesses may experience a competitive
disadvantage relative to larger firms. To exemplify this point, consider a small New Mexico firm
that out-sources its payroll function to another New Mexico firm. While this small business
would pay gross receipts tax on its payroll services, a larger firm with its own payroll division
would not pay gross receipts tax. By targeting the business services tax credit to businesses with
gross receipts under $300 thousand, the bill targets tax relief to small businesses most in need of
relief from pyramiding.
The business services tax credit would be available for business expenditures that are deductible
when calculating net income according to Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). This
Section of the IRC states that all ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in the course
of business may be deducted, including a reasonable allowance for salaries and compensation,
travel expenses, rentals or other payments used for business, and capital contributions to the
Federal National Mortgage Association. Some items that will not be eligible for the business
services tax credit, pursuant to Section 162 of the IRC, are charitable contributions, illegal bribes
and kickbacks, lobbying and political expenditures, application and dues of tax-exempt
organizations, fines or penalties, damage payments under antitrust laws, foreign advertising,
stock reacquisition expenses, and group health plan payments.
LFC notes that while individual credits from the gross receipts tax may have small fiscal
impacts, their cumulative effect significantly narrows the gross receipts tax base. Narrowing the
gross receipts tax base increases revenue volatility and requires a higher tax rate to generate the
same amount of revenue.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD reports that the bill would require major changes to the Combined Revenue System (CRS).
Because an estimated 84 thousand firms will be affected by the bill, credits could not be
processed manually like other existing credits. Automated credit processing will require form
revisions and return processing changes. These administrative changes would be costly and
pg_0004
House Bill 396 – Page
4
cause slower revenue processing. TRD estimates these nonrecurring system changes would cost
about $200 thousand. TRD cautions that these changes could not be completed by the bill’s July
1, 2007 effective date, but could be completed by January 1, 2008.
In addition, about four additional permanent FTE would be required to accomplish workload
imposed on TRD’s revenue processing division. The salaries, benefits, and other recurring costs
associated with these four FTE are estimated to cost $200 thousand.
Automated processing would also mean that the only enforcement tools available to ensure
compliance would be audits. Audit frequency is limited, so inaccuracies and non-compliance will
be more common than in other tax credits.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
TRD claims that major administrative changes necessary to implement the provisions of this bill
could not be accomplished by July 1, 2007. TRD recommends changing the effective date of the
bill to January 1, 2008.
On page 3, line 6, consider deleting the word “taxes" to conform to the intent of the bill, which is
for the gross receipts, not the gross receipts taxes, of entities to be aggregated for calculation of
the credit.
TRD notes that the broad reach of the proposal warrants authorizing TRD to promulgate rules
and regulations to implement the new credit.
SS/nt