Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Miera
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/31/07
HB 362
SHORT TITLE Penalties for Failure To Yield Right of Way
SB
ANALYST Wilson
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
$0.1
Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC)
Corrections Department (CD)
Second Judicial District Attorney (SJDA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 362
The bill creates a new penalty in the Motor Vehicle Code for failure to yield the
right of way. The bill establishes penalties, upon conviction, according to two categories.
When the driver fails to yield, but causes no great bodily injury or death, the driver is guilty of a
misdemeanor. The punishment as set forth in current law is up to $300 fine or imprisonment for
not more than 90 days, or both
When the driver fails to yield, but causes great bodily injury or death, the driver is guilty of
fourth degree felony. The punishment as set forth in current law is18 months imprisonment, and
possibly up to a $5,000 fine.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
There will be a minimal administrative cost for statewide update, distribution and documentation
of statutory changes. Any additional fiscal impact on the judiciary would be proportional to the
enforcement of this law and commenced prosecutions. New laws, amendments to existing laws
and new hearings have the potential to increase caseloads in the courts, thus requiring additional
resources to handle the increase.