Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Saavedra
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
02/04/07
HB 292
SHORT TITLE Faculty Endowment Fund Distributions
SB
ANALYST Williams
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
See Narrative
General Fund
See Narrative
Faculty Endowment
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
See Narrative
Faculty
Endowment
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates SB 260
Relates to SB 645
Relates to LFC budget recommendation of $25 million in non-recurring in FY07 to the faculty
endowment fund.
Relates to Executive budget recommendation of $12 million in nonrecurring in FY08 to the
faculty endowment fund
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
Higher Education Department (HED)
pg_0002
House Bill 292 – Page
2
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 292 changes the nature and distribution of the faculty endowment program.
First, under the provisions of this bill, four-year public higher education institutions would be
able to utilize appropriations made to the faculty endowment fund. In contrast, under current
law, appropriations to the endowment fund must be kept as an endowment by the institution,
once certain management and private match criteria are met. These institutions must then invest
the funds and may utilize only interest earnings to support faculty chairs, professorships and
faculty endowment programs.
Second, the bill authorizes the Governor to identify priority areas of interest for recruitment and
retention of faculty at public, four-year institutions. The bill specifies the name of each type of
chair as follows:
o
Governor’s chair in ______
o
Governor’s professorship in _____
o
Governor’s distinguished faculty member in ______
Third, the bill requires private matching funds as follows:
o
At least $500.0 thousand for Governor’s chair
o
At least $125.0 thousand for Governor’s professorship
o
At least $50.0 thousand for Governor’s distinguished faculty member
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The bill does not contain an appropriation.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
Under current law, the three research institutions and the UNM School of Medicine are eligible
to participate in the endowed chair program, while six of the state’s universities are eligible to
participate in endowed professorships and endowed faculty development programs. Half of the
disbursements are to be for endowed chairs, 35 percent are designated for endowed
professorships and 15 percent are for endowed faculty development programs.
According to Volume II of the LFC budget recommendation: “The committee recommends
consideration of nonrecurring funding of up to $25 million for endowed chairs at the state’s four-
year and two-year postsecondary institutions. The endowed-chair funding achieves several
legislative objectives. The funding provides a mechanism for partnering with noninstitutional
funding organizations, attracting, retaining, and creating incentives for enhanced student
learning, scholarship, and research as well as supporting the multi-faceted missions of the state’s
institutions.
The surplus of nonrecurring general fund monies provides an opportunity to invest in this
initiative because the distributions from the endowment are used for operating purposes of the
endowed faculty positions.
pg_0003
House Bill 292 – Page
3
Expansion of the program to two-year institutions will require changes to 21-1-27.1 NMSA 1978
to reward enhanced student learning activities of faculty at those institutions."
According to the Executive Budget in Brief “Path to Progress, Expanding Opportunity", January
2007: the executive proposal is to “retain and attract high-caliber faculty to the State’s higher
education institutions by creating endowed chairs, particularly in specialized, high-need fields.
Institutions must provide matching funds from private sources, which helps engage the private
sector and alumni."
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
In determining prior-year institutional draw downs from the faculty endowment fund, the HED
has required the university to provide a letter signed by the chair of the board of regents, the
president, and the chief financial officer declaring:
1)
that an endowment account has been established for receipt both of the monies from
the Fund and the non-governmental matching monies;
2)
which kind of endowment is being established (i.e., a chair, professorship, or faculty
development program);
3)
administration of the Fund meets the requirements of Section 21-1-38 NMSA 1978;
and
4)
identification of the source of the non-governmental monies and their permanent
commitment to the endowment.
Faculty endowment funds at institutions are contributing to strong bond ratings for those
institutions.
TECHNICAL ISSUES
The legislature may wish to consider a time limit for qualifying institutions to be able to
drawdown the funding.
The legislature may wish to consider requiring reporting to LFC and the Department of Finance
and Administration on disbursements to each institution, the amount of matching funds and their
source and the purpose of the endowments.
ALTERNATIVES
House Bill 338/Senate Bill 240 from 2006 legislative session.
POSSIBLE QUESTIONS
1.
What is the most effective level of private contribution match to maximize non-state
matching funds, while enabling effective participation in the faculty endowment program
by various institutions.
AW/nt