Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Gonzales
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/25/07
3/07/07 HB
265/aHHGAC/aHTRC/
aHFl
SHORT TITLE Local Option Compensating Taxes
SB
ANALYST Schardin
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
$3,690.5
Recurring Municipalities
$1,581.6
Recurring
Counties
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates SB 144, Conflicts with SB 205, Relates to SB 518, HB 374
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands)
FY07
FY08
FY09 3 Year
Total Cost
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
Total
$2,200.0
$2,200.0
Non-
Recurring
General
Fund
$890.0
$890.0 Recurring General
Fund
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
Responses Received From
New Mexico Municipal League (NMML)
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA)
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of House Floor Amendment #1
The House Floor amendment to Senate Bill 265 further expands exemptions from the newly-
created local option compensating taxes created in the bill to include fuel used by commercial
electric generating facilities to generate electricity.
pg_0002
House Bill 265/aHHGAC/aHTRC/aHFl – Page
2
Synopsis of HTRC Amendment
The House Taxation and Revenue Committee amendment to House Bill 265 changes the
effective date of the bill’s provisions from July 1, 2007 to July 1, 2008 to give TRD enough time
to implement the changes necessary to impose the tax.
The amendment also creates a new exemption from each local option compensating tax that
would be imposed for the use of jet fuel specially prepared and sold for use in turboprop or jet
engines.
Finally, the amendment restricts tangible personal property that will be exempt from the new
local option compensating taxes to property that is subject to depreciation for federal income tax
purposes or property that cannot be obtained in sufficient quantity at comparable terms and
conditions
in New Mexico.
Synopsis of HHGAC Amendment
The House Health and Government Affairs Committee amendment to House Bill 265 widens the
range of tangible personal property that will be exempt from local option compensating taxes
created by this bill. In the original bill, tangible personal property was exempt from the new
taxes if it was subject to depreciation for federal income tax purposes and
could not be obtained
from sources within New Mexico. The amendment changes the bill so that tangible personal
property will be exempt from the new taxes if it meets either
of these two conditions.
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 265 imposes local option compensating taxes in counties and municipalities. Local
option compensating taxes will be imposed at the rate of any local option gross receipts tax in
effect in a county or municipality, and collected by TRD in the same manner as the current state
compensating tax.
Local option compensating taxes will be owed to the jurisdiction in which 1) the buyer’s place of
business is located if the buyer is engaging in business in New Mexico and uses the property in
furtherance of that business, 2) the buyer’s principal office is located if the buyer is a state or
local government agency, or 3) the buyer’s residence is located if the buyer is not engaging in
business in New Mexico.
Section 9 changes the timelines for local governments to hold an election to approve or
disapprove imposition of local option taxes. Currently, such an election must be held within five
months of the date when a local option tax would take effect. The bill reduces that timeline to
three months before a local option tax would take effect.
The original bill provides an exemption from local option compensating taxes for tangible
personal property that is subject to depreciation under federal income tax purposes and tangible
personal property that cannot be obtained from a source within New Mexico. The House Health
and Government Affairs Committee amendment allows tangible personal property meeting either
of these two conditions to be exempt.
pg_0003
House Bill 265/aHHGAC/aHTRC/aHFl – Page
3
The bill will allow TRD to retain 3 percent of all local option compensating tax collections as an
administrative fee.
The bill has an effective date of July 1, 2007.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
TRD estimates the statewide compensating tax base will be about $1,657 million in FY09, and
the statewide weighted average local option tax rate will be 1.67 percent. TRD roughly estimates
that 65 percent of this base will be eligible for the local option compensating tax exemptions
provided in the bill amended by the House Health and Government Affairs Committee. This
suggests that total local option compensating taxes will be about $9.7 million in FY09 (1,657
million X .35% eligible X 1.67% tax rate).
TRD expects the exclusion of jet fuel to reduce local option compensating tax collections by an
additional $500 to $800 thousand per year (LFC assumes $650 thousand). Finally, TRD
estimates the exclusion of fuels used for power plants, such as coal and natural gas, will reduce
local option compensating tax collections by about $3.6 million per year. Therefore, the amended
bill is expected to generate a total of $5.4 million in FY09.
Three percent of this amount, or $163.1 thousand, will be retained by TRD as an administrative
fee. Of the remaining $5.4 million, TRD estimates 70 percent ($3.7 million) will go to
municipalities and 30 percent ($1.6 million) will go to counties.
The compensating tax base that will be subject to local option compensating taxes is expected to
grow by 5 percent per year.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
This bill makes the compensating tax rate equivalent to the gross receipts tax rate to eliminate an
incentive for New Mexico buyers to purchase goods from out-of-state vendors. According to
NMML, New Mexico businesses are currently at a disadvantage with out-of-state businesses
because the compensating tax paid on goods and services from out-of-state is lower than the
statewide gross receipts tax rate, which includes both a statewide tax and several local option
taxes.
The bill will provide an additional stream of revenue to counties and municipalities that are
currently very dependent on gross receipts tax collections. However, some local option gross
receipts taxes are earmarked for specific uses. It is unclear whether some of these specific uses
will be able to make use of more funding.
Local option gross receipts taxes that will be mirrored with new local option compensating taxes
if the bill is enacted include the supplemental municipal gross receipts tax, the municipal local
option gross receipts tax, the local hospital gross receipts tax, the county local option gross
receipts tax, and the county correctional facility gross receipts tax.
The bill allows an exemption from local option compensating taxes for certain tangible personal
property that may depreciated for federal income tax purposes and tangible personal property
that cannot be obtained within New Mexico. According to TRD, federal income tax guidelines
pg_0004
House Bill 265/aHHGAC/aHTRC/aHFl – Page
4
allow most types of tangible property, such as buildings, machinery, vehicles, and furniture to be
depreciated.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
TRD reports that this bill creates major administrative impacts. A new full-page CRS form will
be necessary for TRD to distribute local option compensating taxes to local governments. This,
in turn, would require at least four scanners at a cost of about $550 thousand each ($2.2 million
non-recurring) and maintenance for each scanner of about $160 thousand each ($640 thousand
recurring). Finally, five additional FTE would be required to enter data and verify distributions.
The salaries, benefits, and other recurring costs associated with these five FTE are estimated to
be $250 thousand. Without these additional resources, local option compensating tax
distributions would likely be late. The bill awards TRD an administrative fee for collection of the
new local option compensating taxes. This administrative fee should cover the recurring
administrative costs imposed on TRD by the bill, but will not be sufficient to pay for the
nonrecurring costs of purchasing scanners.
TRD notes that because the local option compensating tax exemptions for tangible personal
property that can be depreciated for federal income tax purposes and tangible personal property
that cannot be obtained in New Mexico do not also apply to the statewide compensating tax,
administration will be more complex. Taxpayer reporting would be simpler if these exemptions
were eliminated or if they also applied to the state compensating tax.
The July 1, 2008 effective date contained in the amended bill gives TRD enough time to make
these changes.
LFC notes that the proposed local option compensating tax will entail high administrative costs
to the state relative to the amount of revenue generated for counties and municipalities. While
TRD expects to have nonrecurring administrative costs of $2.2 million and recurring
administrative costs of $890 thousand, the tax will increase local government revenues by $5.3
million per year. The 3 percent administrative fee retained by TRD will cover only about 20
percent of the recurring administrative cost.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 265 duplicates Senate Bill 144.
House Bill 265 conflicts with Senate Bill 205, which also amends Section 7-20C-2 NMSA 1978.
Senate Bill 205 amends this section to include Union County in the list of counties that may
impose a local hospital gross receipts tax.
House Bill 265 relates to Senate Bill 518 and House Bill 374, which would create new local
option gross receipts taxes that would be mirrored by local option compensating taxes if House
Bill 265 is enacted. Senate Bill 518 creates a county senior citizen services gross receipts tax and
House Bill 374 creates a municipal higher education facilities gross receipts tax.
pg_0005
House Bill 265/aHHGAC/aHTRC/aHFl – Page
5
TECHNICAL ISSUES
TRD noted the following technical issues:
The bill provides that where a local gross receipts tax is in effect on July 1, 2008 the
corresponding local compensating tax is automatically imposed at the same rate. If the local
gross receipts tax was adopted by a vote of the electorate, the subsequent addition of local option
compensating tax may be vulnerable to challenge because it falls outside the scope of the ballot
questions approved by voters.
The bill will cause some conflicts with various tax laws that refer only to local option gross
receipts taxes. For example, many tax credits, such as the investment tax credit found in Section
7-9A-8 NMSA 1978, restrict the amount of credit that may be applied against local option gross
receipts taxes.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
Equalizing gross receipts and compensating tax rates would help New Mexico comply with
future requirements of participation in the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement.
A similar bill was passed by the legislature and vetoed by the governor in 2005 (HB 581). The
governor’s veto message stated that the bill was vetoed because it was “riddled with exemptions
that might unfairly subject certain entities to the tax but not others." House Bill 265 contains
exemptions for tangible personal property that may be depreciated for federal income tax
purposes and for tangible personal property that cannot be obtained in New Mexico, but these
exemptions apply in to all industries rather than the handful that were listed in the 2005 bill.
SS/mt