Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lujan, B.
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/29/07
3/05/07 HB 205/aHTRC
SHORT TITLE State Aviation Fund Distributions & Uses
SB
ANALYST Schardin
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
$1,855.2
Recurring
State Aviation Fund-
GRT Distribution
$149.8
Recurring
State Aviation Fund-
Interest Earnings
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
REVENUE (dollars in thousands)
Estimated Revenue
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
FY09
($1,855.2)
($2,953.0) Recurring General Fund-
GRT
($149.8)
($187.8) Recurring
General Fund-
Interest
Earnings
$1,855.2
$2,953.0 Recurring
State Aviation
Fund- GRT
Distributions
$149.8
$187.8 Recurring
State Aviation
Fund Interest
Earnings
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decreases)
Duplicates SB 222
Conflicts with SB 432
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
LFC Files
pg_0002
House Bill 205/aHTRC – Page
2
Responses Received From
Taxation and Revenue Department (TRD)
Department of Transportation (DOT)
New Mexico Municipal League (NMML)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of HTRC Amendment
The House Taxation and Revenue Committee amendment to House Bill 205 extends the sunset
of a distribution of 0.046 percent of general fund gross receipts tax revenue from June 30, 2007
to June 30, 2012. This distribution is currently spent on the air service assistance program
(ASAP).
Synopsis of Original Bill
House Bill 205 creates a new distribution to the state aviation fund from gross receipts tax
revenue that would otherwise go to the general fund. This distribution will be $80 thousand per
month in FY08, $167 thousand per month in FY09, and $250 thousand per month in FY10 and
beyond. These distributions will be used for planning and program administration, construction,
equipment, materials and maintenance of a system of airports, navigation aids and related
facilities.
The bill also amends Section 64-1-15 NMSA 1978 so that earnings from investment of the state
aviation fund will be credited to that fund and so that state aviation fund balances will no longer
revert to any other fund. The bill also amends this statute so that expenditures from the state
aviation fund will be made in accordance with budgets approved by DOT rather than the
Department of Finance and Administration.
The effective date of these provisions is July 1, 2007.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The original bill creates a new monthly distribution to the state aviation fund from gross receipts
tax collections that are distributed to the general fund under current law. The distribution will
total $960 thousand in FY08, $2.0 million in FY09, and $3 million in FY10 and beyond. All
money in the state aviation fund is automatically appropriated to the Aviation Division of DOT.
The House Taxation and Revenue Committee amendment increases the bill’s fiscal impact.
According to the December 2006 consensus revenue estimate, general fund gross receipts tax
revenues are expected to total $1,945.3 million in FY08, $2,062.0 million in FY09, and $2,179.5
million in FY10. Therefore, the fiscal impact of the bill would be to reduce general fund revenue
by $895.3 thousand in FY08 and by proportionately higher amounts in FY09 through FY12. The
House Taxation and Revenue Committee amendment has no fiscal impact in FY13 and beyond.
By preventing the state aviation fund and its interest earnings from reverting to the general fund,
general fund interest earnings will fall somewhat. Based on average fund balances over the last
two years adjusted for the new distribution created by this bill, general fund interest earnings are
expected to fall by $149.8 thousand in FY08, $187.8 thousand in FY09 and $176.7 million in
pg_0003
House Bill 205/aHTRC – Page
3
FY10 and beyond.
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
According to DOT, House Bill 205 will help leverage additional matching funds from the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for use on statewide airport construction projects. These
airport construction projects need only 5 percent in combined state and local funds to earn a 95
percent federal match.
In FY06, New Mexico received about $6.3 million in FAA discretionary funds, the lowest
amount of all states in the FAA’s southwestern region (Arkansas received $14.5 million,
Louisiana received $34.4 million, Oklahoma received $16.2 million, and Texas received $127.9
million).
DOT reports that New Mexico’s airport infrastructure capital needs are about $60 million per
year, although only about $15 million per year is available. The New Mexico air transportation
system capacity may be reduced due to lack of maintenance funding for existing infrastructure.
At immediate risk are airports in Las Cruces, Moriarty and Zuni, while airports also at risk
include Santa Rosa, Tatum, Fort Sumner, and Roswell.
According to DOT, states that dedicate a reliable revenue stream to aviation improvements are
more likely to be considered by the FAA for block grant status, which leads to significantly
higher federal funding. Texas, which received $127.9 million in FAA matching funds in FY06, is
currently the only block grant state in the southwestern FAA region.
DFA notes that there are currently only two gross receipts tax earmarks in statute— the 0.046
percent earmark to the state aviation fund that will sunset on July 1, 2007 and another for the
Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). All other expenditures are funded instead
through the appropriation process. The argument cited by DOT is that an appropriated revenue
stream is not stable enough for FAA to award block grant status to New Mexico. DFA suggests
that if a stable funding stream is necessary a sunset clause should be added in case federal funds
are permanently reduced or eliminated.
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS
DOT notes that the FAA currently ranks New Mexico as a “poor performer" in terms of
providing airport infrastructure. New Mexico’s main weakness is not having a stable funding
stream for aviation improvements. Without dedicating funding to aviation infrastructure, it will
be difficult for New Mexico to increase its performance ranking and attract additional federal
funding.
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS
If New Mexico qualifies for FAA block grant status DOT’s Aviation Division will assume
greater administrative responsibilities including underrating financial management, processing
federal reimbursements, conducting environmental impact studies, and preparing aviation
infrastructure action plans.
pg_0004
House Bill 205/aHTRC – Page
4
DFA notes that DOT’s Aviation Division currently has seven FTE, and that an influx of funding
provided by this bill may require additional FTE.
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP
House Bill 205 duplicates Senate Bill 222.
House Bill 205 conflicts with Senate Bill 432, which extends the sunset date of a distribution in
the amount of 0.046 percent of general fund gross receipts tax revenues to the state aviation fund
from June 30, 2007 to June 30, 2010.
OTHER SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES
The bill changes the requirement in Section 64-1-15 NMSA 1978 that all state aviation fund
expenditures is made in accordance with budgets approved by DFA so that approval will be
given by DOT. DFA is concerned about this change because of findings that state road fund
revenue for the “100 percent state" construction program was not used exclusively for that
purpose.
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
DOT suggests that New Mexico’s backlog of airport improvement projects will continue to
grow, and the state’s construction sector will not benefit from the stimulus of federal matching
funds available for airport construction.
New Mexico’s airport system will continue to deteriorate and airport safety may be
compromised.
SS/nt:csd