Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance
committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports
if they are used for other purposes.
Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are a vailable on the NM Legislative Website (legis.state.nm.us).
Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and
attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North.
F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T
SPONSOR Lunstrum
ORIGINAL DATE
LAST UPDATED
1/22/07
HB 155
SHORT TITLE
Reducing Audit Requirements for Certain State
Agencies
SB
ANALYST Propst
APPROPRIATION (dollars in thousands)
Appropriation
Recurring
or Non-Rec
Fund
Affected
FY07
FY08
NFI
(Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases)
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
Office of the State Auditor
Responses Received From
Office of the State Auditor (OSA)
SUMMARY
Synopsis of Bill
House Bill 155 is Reducing Audit Requirements for Certain State Agencies. House Bill 155
places annual budget thresholds on how certain state agencies should be audited. The bill adds
language that requires individual state agencies with total annual budgets in excess of one
million dollars ($1,000,000) to have audits conducted in accordance with general accepted
auditing standards and rules issued by the State Auditor. The bill further states that individual
state agencies with total annual budgets of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or less may have
audit reviews conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and rules
issued by the State Auditor.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
The State Auditor does not report any fiscal implications.
pg_0002
House Bill 155 – Page
2
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES
The State Auditor reports that the majority of judicial branch court units have budgets that total
more than one million dollars ($1,000,000). The only court units that have annual budgets less
than or equal to one million dollars ($1,000,000) are the Supreme Court Building Commission,
the Judicial Standards Commission, and the Tenth Judicial District Court. The bill does not
indicate whether or not the annual audit cost will be reduced for these court units as a result of
less formal audit requirements
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL
The State Auditor reports no consequences of not enacting this bill.
WEP/nt:csd